Efficacy outcomes by baseline prostate-specific antigen quartile in the AFFIRM trial Journal Article


Authors: Saad, F.; de Bono, J.; Shore, N.; Fizazi, K.; Loriot, Y.; Hirmand, M.; Franks, B.; Haas, G. P.; Scher, H. I.
Article Title: Efficacy outcomes by baseline prostate-specific antigen quartile in the AFFIRM trial
Abstract: Background Enzalutamide significantly prolonged the survival of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) after docetaxel in the randomised, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational Patients with Progressive Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated with Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy (AFFIRM) trial (NCT00974311). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is commonly used as a marker of PCa disease burden, and the relationship of baseline PSA level to consequent treatment effect is of clinical interest. Objective Exploratory analysis to evaluate any differences in patient characteristics and efficacy outcomes by baseline PSA level in the AFFIRM trial. Design, setting, and participants Post hoc subanalysis of all randomised patients (n = 1199) from the AFFIRM trial. Intervention Participants were randomly assigned in a two-to-one ratio to receive oral enzalutamide 160 mg/d or placebo. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The major clinical efficacy end points were overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and time to PSA progression (TTPP) versus placebo; baseline characteristics, treatment duration, and subsequent antineoplastic therapy were compared by baseline PSA quartile. Results and limitations Baseline PSA quartiles corresponded to the following PSA groups: <40 ng/ml (n = 299), 40 to <111 ng/ml (n = 300), 111 to <406 ng/ml (n = 300), and ≥406 ng/ml (n = 300). Enzalutamide consistently improved OS, rPFS, and TTPP compared with placebo across all subgroups, regardless of baseline PSA level. Hazard ratios for improvements in OS were 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.85), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.47-1.02), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.53-1.01), and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.39-0.73) for PSA groups 1-4, respectively. The post hoc design of this analysis was not statistically powered to assess the relationship between baseline PSA and clinical efficacy outcomes. Conclusions This post hoc analysis of the AFFIRM trial demonstrates consistent benefits in OS, rPFS, and TTPP with enzalutamide regardless of baseline disease severity, as assessed by PSA. Patient summary Exploratory post hoc analysis of the AFFIRM trial showed that enzalutamide improves overall survival, radiographic progression-free survival, and time to prostate-specific antigen progression compared with placebo regardless of baseline disease severity, as assessed by prostate-specific antigen. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00974311.
Keywords: prostate-specific antigen; enzalutamide; metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; affirm trial; androgen receptor inhibitor
Journal Title: European Urology
Volume: 67
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0302-2838
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2014-02-01
Start Page: 223
End Page: 230
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.025
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 25171902
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 2 February 2015 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Howard Scher
    1130 Scher