Use of dynamic telepathology in Mohs surgery: A feasibility study Journal Article


Authors: Nehal, K. S.; Busam, K. J.; Halpern, A. C.
Article Title: Use of dynamic telepathology in Mohs surgery: A feasibility study
Abstract: BACKGROUND. Telepathology is an emerging technology for remote pathology consultation and diagnosis. OBJECTIVE. To assess the diagnostic accuracy and utility of a dynamic telepathology system in the setting of Mohs surgery. METHODS. Using a dynamic telepathology system, a single dermatopathologist at a remote site assessed the following cases: (1) 50 fixed-tissue slides of basal and squamous cell carcinomas for pathologic diagnosis; (2) 40 frozen-section slides from Mohs surgery for the presence or absence of tumor; (3) 20 frozen-section slides from Mohs surgery for intraoperative consultation with the Mohs surgeon. All 110 slides were then randomly reviewed by the same dermatopathologist by conventional light microscopy. Telepathology and conventional light microscopy diagnoses were then compared. RESULTS. There was complete agreement between telepathology and conventional light microscopy diagnoses. CONCLUSION. Dynamic telepathology is a convenient, useful, and accurate system for remote diagnosis and consultation in the setting of Mohs surgery.
Keywords: controlled study; human tissue; surgical technique; major clinical study; histopathology; microscopy; squamous cell carcinoma; carcinoma, squamous cell; treatment planning; diagnostic accuracy; basal cell carcinoma; skin neoplasms; pathology; feasibility studies; intraoperative period; carcinoma, basal cell; mohs surgery; chemosurgery; technology; telepathology; humans; human; priority journal; article
Journal Title: Dermatologic Surgery
Volume: 28
Issue: 5
ISSN: 1076-0512
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2002-05-01
Start Page: 422
End Page: 426
Language: English
DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01260.x
PUBMED: 12030877
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 14 November 2014 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Allan C Halpern
    396 Halpern
  2. Kishwer S Nehal
    279 Nehal
  3. Klaus J Busam
    689 Busam