Sunitinib malate in the treatment of recurrent or persistent uterine leiomyosarcoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II study Journal Article


Authors: Hensley, M. L.; Sill, M. W.; Scribner, D. R. Jr; Brown, J.; DeBernardo, R. L.; Hartenbach, E. M.; McCourt, C. K.; Bosscher, J. R.; Gehrig, P. A.
Article Title: Sunitinib malate in the treatment of recurrent or persistent uterine leiomyosarcoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II study
Abstract: Purpose: New agents are needed for patients with metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma who progress after treatment with doxorubicin or gemcitabine-docetaxel. Agents targeting tumor vasculature have potential for activity in leiomyosarcoma. We aimed to assess the activity of sunitinib in patients with recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma who had received one or two prior therapies by determining the frequency of patients who survived progression-free for at least 6 months or who achieved objective tumor response. We also aimed to characterize the toxicity of sunitinib and to estimate time-to-progression. Patients and methods: Eligible patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma were treated with sunitinib 50 mg by mouth daily for 4 weeks, with 2 weeks rest. Tumor response and progression-free status were assessed every 6 weeks. Results: Twenty-three of 25 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy (two wrong histologies). The median number of cycles was one. Two of 23 patients achieved a partial response (8.7%, 90% two-sided, binomial confidence interval (CI) 1.6-24.9%). Four patients remained progression-free at 6 months (17.4%, 90% two-sided, binomial confidence interval 6.2-35.5%). Toxicities included: grade 3 neutropenia (17.4%); grade 3 thrombocytopenia (13%); grade 3 anemia (17.4%); grades 3-4 lymphopenia (8.7%); grades 3-4 fatigue (30%); grade 3 vomiting/diarrhea (21.7%); skin rash/hand-foot syndrome, grade 2 (13%), grade 3 (4.3%); hypertension, grade 2 (39%), grade 3 (4.3%); grade 2 decrease in cardiac ejection fraction (4.3%), and grade 3 thrombosis (4.3%) Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.5 months. Conclusion: Sunitinib fails to achieve sufficient objective response or sustained disease stabilization as second- or third-line treatment for uterine leiomyosarcoma. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; cancer chemotherapy; clinical article; controlled study; treatment response; aged; clinical trial; fatigue; neutropenia; sunitinib; drug dose reduction; drug efficacy; hypertension; side effect; skin toxicity; treatment duration; neurotoxicity; recurrent cancer; progression free survival; infection; lung toxicity; multiple cycle treatment; nephrotoxicity; pain; phase 2 clinical trial; anemia; bleeding; thrombocytopenia; weight reduction; chill; drug fever; lymphocytopenia; gastrointestinal toxicity; insomnia; rigor; morning dosage; thrombosis; leiomyosarcoma; heart left ventricle ejection fraction; metabolic disorder; musculoskeletal disease; uterine leiomyosarcoma; uterus leiomyosarcoma; endocrine disease; eye toxicity
Journal Title: Gynecologic Oncology
Volume: 115
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0090-8258
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2009-12-01
Start Page: 460
End Page: 465
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.011
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC2783261
PUBMED: 19811811
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 3" - "Export Date: 30 November 2010" - "CODEN: GYNOA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Martee L Hensley
    289 Hensley