Prognostic significance of depth of gross or microscopic perirectal fat invasion in T3 N0 M0 rectal cancers following sharp mesorectal excision and no adjuvant therapy Journal Article


Authors: Picon, A. I.; Moore, H. G.; Sternberg, S. S.; Minsky, B. D.; Paty, P. B.; Blumberg, D.; Quan, S. H.; Wong, W. D.; Cohen, A. M.; Guillem, J. G.
Article Title: Prognostic significance of depth of gross or microscopic perirectal fat invasion in T3 N0 M0 rectal cancers following sharp mesorectal excision and no adjuvant therapy
Abstract: Background and aims. Although the standard of care for T3 and/or N1-2 rectal cancers includes adjuvant chemoradiation, it is unclear whether T3 N0 patients with limited microscopic perirectal fat invasion warrant further therapy. Our aim was to determine the prognostic significance of gross perirectal fat invasion, or depth of microscopic perirectal fat invasion, in T3 N0 rectal cancers following sharp mesorectal excision and no adjuvant therapy. Patients and methods. Utilizing a prospective database, the medical records of 108 patients who underwent a potentially curative resection for T3 N0 rectal cancer between June 1986 and December 1994 were analyzed. All pathological specimens were re-reviewed by a single pathologist, and extent of perirectal fat invasion was measured in millimeters. Patients who received either preoperative or postoperative adjuvant therapy were excluded. Results. Macroscopic perirectal fat invasion (T3 gross) was present in 49 cases, absent in 40 cases (T3 microscopic), and not reported in 19 cases. Rectal cancers were stratified by extent of measured perirectal fat invasion into 3 mm or less and more than 3 mm. Five-year overall and local recurrence rates for the entire group were 19% and 8%, respectively. The disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall recurrence for rectal cancers with 3 mm or less invasion vs. more than 3 mm invasion, or T3 gross vs. T3 microscopic, were not statistically different. Conclusion. Our data suggest that the extent of gross, or microscopic perirectal fat invasion (defined as >3 or ≤3 mm), determined in the resected specimen, does not predict outcome in select T3 N0 rectal cancers.
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; controlled study; aged; aged, 80 and over; disease-free survival; middle aged; excision; major clinical study; microscopy; cancer recurrence; cancer adjuvant therapy; postoperative care; radiotherapy, adjuvant; prospective study; prospective studies; metastasis; pathology; data base; prediction; cancer invasion; statistical analysis; medical record; data analysis; measurement; outcomes research; surgical procedures, operative; neoplasm invasiveness; preoperative treatment; databases, factual; rectal neoplasms; rectum cancer; pathologist; rectum resection; adipose tissue; total mesorectal excision; body fat; rectal neoplasm; humans; prognosis; human; male; female; priority journal; article; ajduvant radiation
Journal Title: International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Volume: 18
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0179-1958
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2003-11-01
Start Page: 487
End Page: 492
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-003-0504-1
PUBMED: 12783251
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 12 September 2014 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Harvey Moore
    31 Moore
  2. Philip B Paty
    496 Paty
  3. Bruce Minsky
    306 Minsky
  4. Antonio Ignacio Picon
    17 Picon
  5. Stuart H. Q. Quan
    28 Quan
  6. Jose Guillem
    414 Guillem
  7. Alfred M Cohen
    244 Cohen
  8. Douglas W Wong
    178 Wong