A phase II trial of arzoxifene, a selective estrogen response modulator, in patients with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer Journal Article


Authors: McMeekin, D. S.; Gordon, A.; Fowler, J.; Melemed, A.; Buller, R.; Burke, T.; Bloss, J.; Sabbatini, P.
Article Title: A phase II trial of arzoxifene, a selective estrogen response modulator, in patients with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer
Abstract: Objective. The goal of this study was to determine response rate and evaluate toxicity of LY353381 (arzoxifene) in patients with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer (EC). Methods. A phase II, open-labeled study with arzoxifene was performed at 13 centers. Patients with measurable recurrent/advanced EC not amenable to curative therapies were eligible if either the primary tumor or recurrent tumor was ER+ and/or PR+. If receptor status could not be determined, patients with well or moderately well-differentiated EC were also permitted. Prior use of salvage chemotherapy was not allowed; however, prior use of progestagens was permitted and patients were stratified by prior exposure to progestagen. Patients received 20 mg/day PO, and were treated for at least 8 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy was based on the frequency of complete (CR) and partial (PR) responses, and a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze time to progression and duration of response. Results. From February 1999 through April 2001, 37 patients were entered of whom 34 received treatment. Efficacy was evaluated for the 29 patients who received at least 4 weeks of therapy and at least one tumor response assessment. Safety was assessed in all 34 patients who received any drug. Thirty patients were defined as progestagen sensitive, and 4 patients were defined as progestagen failures. Twenty-six patients were ER+, and 22 were PR+. Nine (1 CR + 8 PR) of 29 patients responded (31%, CI 25-51%), with a median duration of response of 13.9 months. All 9 responses occurred in progestagen-sensitive patients. Two additional patients (one from each progestagen cohort) had stable disease for ≥6 months. The median progression-free interval was 3.7 months (CI 1.9-6.6 months) for all 29 patients. Toxicity was minimal with no grade 3-4 toxic effects, and 9 patients had only grade 1-2 toxic effects (7 grade 1, 2 grade 2). Hot flashes were the most common toxic effect and, in all 3 reported cases, were grade 1. Conclusions. Arzoxifene has demonstrated a high response rate with the longest median duration of response reported in a phase II trial of this patient population. The ease of administration and extremely favorable toxicity profile make this an agent warranting further evaluation. © 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; cancer chemotherapy; clinical article; controlled study; treatment outcome; aged; aged, 80 and over; disease-free survival; middle aged; treatment failure; unclassified drug; clinical trial; disease course; salvage therapy; advanced cancer; cancer growth; drug efficacy; drug safety; side effect; disease free survival; recurrent cancer; endometrium carcinoma; endometrial neoplasms; anorexia; edema; controlled clinical trial; phase 2 clinical trial; neoplasm recurrence, local; vomiting; myalgia; tumor differentiation; cohort analysis; weight reduction; confidence interval; blood; multicenter study; tumor recurrence; pancreatitis; drug response; piperidines; hot flush; drug blood level; kaplan meier method; drug metabolite; dry skin; alopecia; drug sensitivity; endometrium tumor; drug exposure; phlebitis; calculation; gestagen; pigment disorder; piperidine derivative; thiophene derivative; thiophenes; selective estrogen receptor modulator; selective estrogen receptor modulators; arzoxifene; humans; human; female; priority journal; article; norarzoxifene; gangrene
Journal Title: Gynecologic Oncology
Volume: 90
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0090-8258
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2003-07-01
Start Page: 64
End Page: 69
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00203-8
PUBMED: 12821343
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 12 September 2014 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Paul J Sabbatini
    262 Sabbatini