Age-adjusted International Prognostic Index predicts autologous stem cell transplantation outcome for patients with relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Journal Article


Authors: Hamlin, P. A.; Zelenetz, A. D.; Kewalramani, T.; Qin, J.; Satagopan, J. M.; Verbel, D.; Noy, A.; Portlock, C. S.; Straus, D. J.; Yahalom, J.; Nimer, S. D.; Moskowitz, C. H.
Article Title: Age-adjusted International Prognostic Index predicts autologous stem cell transplantation outcome for patients with relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Abstract: Second-line chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) cures less than half of the patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Prognostic models capable of predicting outcome are essential. In 3 sequential clinical trials, conducted from January 1993 to August 2000, we treated 150 patients with relapsed or primary refractory DLBCL with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy followed by HDT/ASCT for patients with chemosensitive disease. We evaluated the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index at the initiation of second-line therapy (sAAIPI) as a predictor of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). At a median follow-up of 4 years, the PFS and OS are 28% and 34% by intention to treat and 39% and 45% for only those patients with chemosensitive disease. Three risk groups with different PFS and OS were identified by the sAAIPI: low risk (0 factors), 70% and 74%; intermediate risk (1 factor), 39% and 49%; and high risk (2 or 3 factors), 16% and 18% (P < .001 for both PFS and OS). The sAAIPI also predicts the PFS and OS for patients with ICE-chemosensitive disease: low risk, 69% and 83%; intermediate risk, 46% and 55%; and high risk, 25% and 26% (P < .001 PFS and OS). The sAAIPI predicts outcome for patients with relapsed or primary refractory DLBCL in both intent-to-treat and chemosensitive populations. This powerful prognostic instrument should be used to evaluate new treatment approaches and to compare results of different regimens. © 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.
Keywords: adolescent; adult; cancer chemotherapy; cancer survival; controlled study; treatment outcome; aged; aged, 80 and over; disease-free survival; middle aged; survival rate; major clinical study; cancer risk; antineoplastic agents; combined modality therapy; carboplatin; etoposide; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; risk factors; recurrence; stem cell transplantation; chemosensitivity; ifosfamide; b cell lymphoma; lymphoma, b-cell; predictive value of tests; age distribution; transplantation, autologous; autotransplantation; lymphoma, large-cell, diffuse; humans; prognosis; human; male; female; priority journal; article
Journal Title: Blood
Volume: 102
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0006-4971
Publisher: American Society of Hematology  
Date Published: 2003-09-15
Start Page: 1989
End Page: 1996
Language: English
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3837
PUBMED: 12676776
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 12 September 2014 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Joachim Yahalom
    625 Yahalom
  2. Carol Portlock
    204 Portlock
  3. Craig Moskowitz
    407 Moskowitz
  4. Ariela Noy
    351 Noy
  5. Jaya M Satagopan
    141 Satagopan
  6. Jing Qin
    86 Qin
  7. David A Verbel
    20 Verbel
  8. Andrew D Zelenetz
    767 Zelenetz
  9. Stephen D Nimer
    347 Nimer
  10. Paul Hamlin
    277 Hamlin
  11. David J Straus
    356 Straus