Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance perfusion compared with digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of extradural spinal metastases: A pilot study Journal Article


Authors: Mazura, J. C.; Karimi, S.; Pauliah, M.; Banihashemi, M. A.; Gobin, Y. P.; Bilsky, M. H.; Patsalides, A.
Article Title: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance perfusion compared with digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of extradural spinal metastases: A pilot study
Abstract: Study Design.: This was a retrospective study comparing dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MR) perfusion with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in determining the vascularity of spinal tumors. Objective.: To report on the efficacy of DCE-MR perfusion as a potential noninvasive surrogate for measuring vascularity and thus determine the need for preoperative embolization. Summary of Background Data.: Although primary spinal tumors are rare, spine metastases are relatively common and symptomatic in approximately 14% of patients. Symptomatic patients require palliation with radiotherapy and/or surgery, with possible preoperative endovascular embolization of the tumor. Methods.: A retrospective review revealed 10 patients with 11 diseased vertebral bodies who had received spine DCE-MR perfusion studies and subsequently underwent spinal DSA. Processed MR data were used to calculate a blood flow ratio comparing blood flow with a diseased and an adjacent normal vertebral body. Spinal tumor vascularity was graded on the basis of angiographic tumor blush from 0 (decreased enhancement compared with a normal vertebral body) to 4 (marked tumor blush with early arteriovenous shunting). Results.: Eight vertebral bodies demonstrated increased vascularity on DSA with blood flow ratios of greater than 1.8, 2 vertebral bodies demonstrated normal enhancement on DSA with cerebral blood flow (CBF) ratio of 0.55 to 1.14, and 1 vertebral body level had decreased enhancement on DSA, with a CBF ratio of 0.43. There was a strong correlation between CBF ratio and DSA score, with Spearman ρ = 0.87 (P = 0.00012). Conclusion.: These data show a statistically significant correlation between CBF ratio and DSA and suggest that DCE-MR perfusion can serve as a surrogate to DSA for determining tumor vascularity in patients with extramedullary spinal metastases. © 2014 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Keywords: spine metastasis; dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance perfusion (dcemr perfusion); hyper vascular spinal tumors; magnetic resonance perfusion; spine angiography; spine embolization
Journal Title: Spine
Volume: 39
Issue: 16
ISSN: 0362-2436
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2014-07-15
Start Page: E950
End Page: E954
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000409
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 24827525
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 1 August 2014 -- CODEN: SPIND -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Mark H Bilsky
    319 Bilsky
  2. Sasan Karimi
    114 Karimi
  3. Mohan Pauliah
    10 Pauliah