Cannabinoids in oral fluid by on-site immunoassay and by GC-MS using two different oral fluid collection devices Journal Article


Authors: Desrosiers, N. A.; Milman, G.; Mendu, D. R.; Lee, D.; Barnes, A. J.; Gorelick, D. A.; Huestis, M. A.
Article Title: Cannabinoids in oral fluid by on-site immunoassay and by GC-MS using two different oral fluid collection devices
Abstract: Oral fluid (OF) enables non-invasive sample collection for on-site drug testing, but performance of on-site tests with occasional and frequent smokers' OF to identify cannabinoid intake requires further evaluation. Furthermore, as far as we are aware, no studies have evaluated differences between cannabinoid disposition among OF collection devices with authentic OF samples after controlled cannabis administration. Fourteen frequent (≥4 times per week) and 10 occasional (less than twice a week) adult cannabis smokers smoked one 6.8 % Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) cigarette ad libitum over 10 min. OF was collected with the StatSure Saliva Sampler, Oral-Eze, and Draeger DrugTest 5000 test cassette before and up to 30 h after cannabis smoking. Test cassettes were analyzed within 15 min and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry cannabinoid results were obtained within 24 h. Cannabinoid concentrations with the StatSure and Oral-Eze devices were compared and times of last cannabinoid detection (t last) and DrugTest 5000 test performance were assessed for different cannabinoid cutoffs. 11-nor-9-Carboxy-THC (THCCOOH) and cannabinol concentrations were significantly higher in Oral-Eze samples than in Stat-Sure samples. DrugTest 5000 t last for a positive cannabinoid test were median (range) 12 h (4-24 h) and 21 h (1-≥30 h) for occasional and frequent smokers, respectively. Detection windows in screening and confirmatory tests were usually shorter for occasional than for frequent smokers, especially when including THCCOOH ≥20 ng L-1 in confirmation criteria. No differences in t last were observed between collection devices, except for THC ≥2 μg L-1. We thus report significantly different THCCOOH and cannabinol, but not THC, concentrations between OF collection devices, which may affect OF data interpretation. The DrugTest 5000 on-site device had high diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency for cannabinoids. © 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (outside the USA).
Keywords: testing; sample collection; electrophoresis; gas chromatography; cannabinoid; cannabis; gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; data interpretation; data processing; draeger drugtest 5000; on-site test; oral fluid; collection device; on-site tests; oral fluids
Journal Title: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Volume: 406
Issue: 17
ISSN: 1618-2642
Publisher: Springer Verlag  
Date Published: 2014-07-01
Start Page: 4117
End Page: 4128
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-7813-9
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 24828976
PMCID: PMC4259565
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 1 August 2014 -- CODEN: ABCNB -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Damodara Rao Mendu
    4 Mendu