Prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator 2.0 for the prediction of low- vs high-grade prostate cancer Journal Article


Authors: Ankerst, D. P.; Hoefler, J.; Bock, S.; Goodman, P. J.; Vickers, A.; Hernandez, J.; Sokoll, L. J.; Sanda, M. G.; Wei, J. T.; Leach, R. J.; Thompson, I. M.
Article Title: Prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator 2.0 for the prediction of low- vs high-grade prostate cancer
Abstract: Objective: To modify the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator (PCPTRC) to predict low- vs high-grade (Gleason grade ≥7) prostate cancer and incorporate percent free-prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Methods: Data from 6664 Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial placebo arm biopsies (5826 individuals), where prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination results were available within 1 year before the biopsy and PSA was ≤10 ng/mL, were used to develop a nominal logistic regression model to predict the risk of no vs low-grade (Gleason grade ;lt&7) vs high-grade cancer (Gleason grade ≥7). Percent free-PSA was incorporated into the model based on likelihood ratio analysis of a San Antonio Biomarkers of Risk cohort. Models were externally validated on 10 Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group cohorts and 1 Early Detection Research Network reference set. Results: Of all the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial biopsies, 5468 (82.1%) were negative for prostate cancer, 942 (14.1%) detected low-grade, and 254 (3.8%) detected high-grade disease. Significant predictors were (log base 2) PSA (odds ratio for low-grade vs no cancer, 1.29*; high-grade vs no cancer, 2.02*; high-grade vs low-grade cancer, 1.57*), digital rectal examination (0.96, 1.49*, 1.55*, respectively), age (1.02*, 1.05*, 1.03*, respectively), African American race (1.13, 2.83*, 2.51*, respectively), prior biopsy (0.63*, 0.81, 1.27, respectively), and family history (1.31*, 1.25, 0.95, respectively), where* indicates P value ≤.05. The new PCPTRC 2.0 either with or without percent free-PSA (also significant by the likelihood ratio method) validated well externally. Conclusion: By differentiating the risk of low- vs high-grade disease on biopsy, PCPTRC 2.0 better enables physician-patient counseling concerning whether to proceed to biopsy. © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Keywords: adult; aged; major clinical study; cancer grading; diagnostic accuracy; prostate specific antigen; risk factor; age; risk assessment; prostate cancer; gleason score; family history; prostate biopsy; logistic regression analysis; african american; predictive value; digital rectal examination; human; male; priority journal; article
Journal Title: Urology
Volume: 83
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0090-4295
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2014-06-01
Start Page: 1362
End Page: 1367
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.035
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC4035700
PUBMED: 24862395
DOI/URL:
Notes: Urology -- Export Date: 8 July 2014 -- CODEN: URGYA -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Andrew J Vickers
    880 Vickers