Cost-effectiveness of pulmonary resection and systemic chemotherapy in the management of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: A combined analysis from the University of Texas M. D. Anderson and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centers Journal Article


Authors: Porter, G. A.; Cantor, S. B.; Walsh, G. L.; Rusch, V. W.; Leung, D. H.; DeJesus, A. Y.; Pollock, R. E.; Brennan, M. F.; Pisters, P. W. T.
Article Title: Cost-effectiveness of pulmonary resection and systemic chemotherapy in the management of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: A combined analysis from the University of Texas M. D. Anderson and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centers
Abstract: Background: We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of different treatment strategies for patients with pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma. Methods: We constructed a decision tree to model the outcomes of 4 treatment strategies for patients with pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma: pulmonary resection, systemic chemotherapy, pulmonary resection and systemic chemotherapy, and no treatment. Data from 1124 patients with pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma were used to estimate disease-specific survival for pulmonary resection and no treatment. Outcomes of systemic chemotherapy and pulmonary resection and of systemic chemotherapy were estimated by assuming a 12-month improvement in disease-specific survival with chemotherapy; this was done on the basis of the widely held but unproven assumption that chemotherapy provides a survival benefit in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Direct costs were examined for a series of patients who underwent protocol-based pulmonary resection or doxorubicin/ifosfamide-based chemotherapy. Results: The mean cost of pulmonary resection was $20,339 per patient; the mean cost of 6 cycles of chemotherapy was $99,033. Compared with no treatment and assuming a 12-month survival advantage with chemotherapy, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $14,357 per life-year gained for pulmonary resection, $104,210 per life-year gained for systemic chemotherapy, and $51,159 per life-year gained for pulmonary resection and systemic chemotherapy. Compared with pulmonary resection, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of pulmonary resection and systemic chemotherapy was $108,036 per life-year gained. Sensitivity analyses showed that certain patient and tumor features, as well as the assumed benefit of chemotherapy, affected cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: For patients with pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma who were surgical candidates, pulmonary resection was the most cost-effective treatment strategy evaluated. Even with favorable assumptions regarding its clinical benefit, systemic chemotherapy alone, compared with no treatment, was not a cost-effective treatment strategy for these patients.
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; treatment outcome; survival rate; major clinical study; doxorubicin; cancer combination chemotherapy; risk benefit analysis; antineoplastic agents; united states; combined modality therapy; antineoplastic agent; sensitivity analysis; lung resection; lung neoplasms; pneumonectomy; practice guideline; ifosfamide; sarcoma; cost effectiveness analysis; health care cost; lung metastasis; soft tissue sarcoma; intermethod comparison; university hospital; cost-benefit analysis; decision trees; costs and cost analysis; decision support techniques; humans; human; priority journal; article
Journal Title: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume: 127
Issue: 5
ISSN: 0022-5223
Publisher: Mosby Elsevier  
Date Published: 2004-05-01
Start Page: 1366
End Page: 1372
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.11.016
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 15115994
DOI/URL:
Notes: J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. -- Cited By (since 1996):24 -- Export Date: 16 June 2014 -- CODEN: JTCSA -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Murray F Brennan
    1059 Brennan
  2. Valerie W Rusch
    864 Rusch