Inconsistent mammography perceptions and practices among women at risk of breast cancer following a pediatric malignancy: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Journal Article


Authors: Smith, S. M.; Ford, J. S.; Rakowski, W.; Moskowitz, C. S.; Diller, L.; Hudson, M. M.; Mertens, A. C.; Stanton, A. L.; Henderson, T. O.; Leisenring, W. M.; Robison, L. L.; Oeffinger, K. C.
Article Title: Inconsistent mammography perceptions and practices among women at risk of breast cancer following a pediatric malignancy: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
Abstract: Women treated with chest radiation for a pediatric cancer have low mammography screening rates despite their high risk for breast cancer. This study characterized the relationship between perceptions of mammography and screening practices. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 523 women in North America who were treated with chest radiation before 21 years of age. Women with inconsistent mammography perceptions and practices were identified using the Pros and Cons of Mammography for perceptions and Transtheoretical Model stages of adoption for prior and intended screening practices. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to identify barriers to and facilitators of screening among women with positive and negative perceptions. Nearly one-third of the cohort had inconsistent perceptions and practices: 37.4% had positive perceptions and were not having mammograms; 27.6% had negative/neutral perceptions and were having mammograms. Regardless of perceptions, a recent physician's recommendation for mammography, age ≥ 40, and interest in routine health care were universally associated with mammography practices. For women with positive perceptions and a physician's recommendation, barriers to screening included high acceptance coping, low active-planning coping, and high internal health locus of control. For women with negative perceptions, acknowledging the importance of asymptomatic screening was associated with mammography. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Keywords: adult; child; controlled study; middle aged; major clinical study; cancer risk; cancer radiotherapy; cancer staging; neoplasms; breast cancer; radiotherapy; mass screening; practice guideline; breast neoplasms; survivor; late effects; risk; survivors; health care; mammography; screening; neoplasms, radiation-induced; cross-sectional study; cross-sectional studies; reliability; cancer classification; health knowledge, attitudes, practice; regression analysis; patient attitude; statistics, nonparametric; north america; pediatrics; child health; cancer survivorship; stages of adoption; transtheoretical model
Journal Title: Cancer Causes & Control
Volume: 21
Issue: 10
ISSN: 0957-5243
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2010-10-01
Start Page: 1585
End Page: 1595
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-010-9587-5
PUBMED: 20506037
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC2941535
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 20 April 2011" - "CODEN: CCCNE" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Stephanie M Smith
    6 Smith
  2. Jennifer S Ford
    63 Ford
  3. Chaya S. Moskowitz
    278 Moskowitz
  4. Kevin Oeffinger
    296 Oeffinger