Effects of tadalafil treatment on erectile function recovery following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: A randomised placebo-controlled study (REACTT) Journal Article


Authors: Montorsi, F.; Brock, G.; Stolzenburg, J. U.; Mulhall, J.; Moncada, I.; Patel, H. R. H.; Chevallier, D.; Krajka, K.; Henneges, C.; Dickson, R.; Büttner, H.
Article Title: Effects of tadalafil treatment on erectile function recovery following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: A randomised placebo-controlled study (REACTT)
Abstract: Background The potential rehabilitative and protective effect of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) on penile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP) remains unclear. Objective The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg once daily and tadalafil 20 mg on demand versus placebo taken over 9 mo in improving unassisted erectile function (EF) following NSRP, as measured by the proportion of patients achieving an International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF) score ≥22 after 6-wk drug-free washout (DFW). Secondary measures included IIEF-EF, Sexual Encounter Profile question 3 (SEP-3), and penile length. Design, setting, and participants Randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial in men ≤68 yr of age with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (Gleason ≤7) and normal preoperative EF who underwent NSRP at 50 centres from nine European countries and Canada. Interventions 1:1:1 randomisation to 9 mo of treatment with tadalafil 5 mg once daily, tadalafil 20 mg on demand, or placebo followed by a 6-wk DFW and 3-mo open-label tadalafil once daily (all patients). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Logistic regression, mixed-effects model for repeated measures, and analysis of covariance, adjusting for treatment, age, and country, were applied to IIEF-EF scores ≥22, SEP-3, and penile length. Results and limitations Four hundred twenty-three patients were randomised to tadalafil once daily (n = 139), on demand (n = 143), and placebo (n = 141). The mean age was 57.9 yr of age (standard deviation: 5.58 yr); 20.9%, 16.9%, and 19.1% of patients in the tadalafil once daily, on demand, and placebo groups, respectively, achieved IIEF EF scores ≥22 after DFW; odds ratios for tadalafil once daily and on demand versus placebo were 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-2.1; p = 0.675) and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.7; p = 0.704). At the end of double-blind treatment (EDT), least squares (LS) mean IIEF-EF score improvement significantly exceeded the minimally clinically important difference (MCID: ΔIIEF-EF ≥4) in both tadalafil groups; for SEP-3 (MCID ≥ 23%), this was the case for tadalafil once daily only. Treatment effects versus placebo were significant for tadalafil once daily only (IIEF-EF: p = 0.016; SEP-3: p = 0.019). In all groups, IIEF-EF and SEP-3 decreased during DFW but continued to improve during open-label treatment. At month 9 (EDT), penile length loss was significantly reduced versus placebo in the tadalafil once daily group only (LS mean difference 4.1 mm; 95% CI, 0.4-7.8; p = 0.032). Conclusions Tadalafil once daily was most effective on drug-assisted EF in men with erectile dysfunction following NSRP, and data suggest a potential role for tadalafil once daily provided early after surgery in contributing to the recovery of EF after prostatectomy and possibly protecting from penile structural changes. Unassisted EF was not improved after cessation of active therapy for 9 mo. Trial registration ClinicalTrials. © 2013 European Association of Urology.
Keywords: prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; rehabilitation; erectile dysfunction; phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors; clinical trials; nerve-sparing prostatectomy; penile function; tadalafil once a day
Journal Title: European Urology
Volume: 65
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0302-2838
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2014-03-01
Start Page: 587
End Page: 596
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.051
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 24169081
DOI/URL:
Notes: Cited By (since 1996):3 -- Export Date: 2 April 2014 -- CODEN: EUURA -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. John P Mulhall
    601 Mulhall