Six-month progression-free survival as the primary endpoint to evaluate the activity of new agents as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma Journal Article


Authors: Agarwal, N.; Bellmunt, J.; Maughan, B. L.; Boucher, K. M.; Choueiri, T. K.; Qu, A. Q.; Vogelzang, N. J.; Fougeray, R.; Niegisch, G.; Albers, P.; Wong, Y. N.; Ko, Y. J.; Sridhar, S. S.; Tantravahi, S. K.; Galsky, M. D.; Petrylak, D. P.; Vaishampayan, U. N.; Mehta, A. N.; Beer, T. M.; Sternberg, C. N.; Rosenberg, J. E.; Sonpavde, G.
Article Title: Six-month progression-free survival as the primary endpoint to evaluate the activity of new agents as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma
Abstract: Objective Second-line systemic therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) has substantial unmet needs, and current agents show dismal activity. Second-line trials of metastatic UC have used response rate (RR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) as primary endpoints, which may not reflect durable benefits. A more robust endpoint to identify signals of durable benefits when investigating new agents in second-line trials may expedite drug development. PFS at 6 months (PFS6) is a candidate endpoint, which may correlate with overall survival (OS) at 12 months (OS12) and may be applicable across cytostatic and cytotoxic agents. Methods Ten second-line phase II trials with individual patient outcomes data evaluating chemotherapy or biologics were combined for discovery, followed by external validation in a phase III trial. The relationship between PFS6/RR and OS12 was assessed at the trial level using Pearson correlation and weighted linear regression, and at the individual level using Pearson chi-square test with Yates continuity correction. Results In the discovery dataset, a significant correlation was observed between PFS6 and OS12 at the trial (R2 = 0.55, Pearson correlation = 0.66) and individual levels (82%, Òš = 0.45). Response correlated with OS12 at the individual level less robustly (78%, Òš = 0.36), and the trial level association was not statistically significant (R2 = 0.16, Pearson correlation = 0.37). The correlation of PFS6 (81%, Òš = 0.44) appeared stronger than the correlation of response (76%, Òš = 0.17) with OS12 in the external validation dataset. Conclusions PFS6 is strongly associated with OS12 and appears more optimal than RR to identify active second-line agents for advanced UC. © 2014 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords: overall survival; second-line treatment; advanced urothelial carcinoma; intermediate endpoint; progression-free survival at 6 months
Journal Title: Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
Volume: 12
Issue: 2
ISSN: 1558-7673
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2014-04-01
Start Page: 130
End Page: 137
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2013.09.002
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 24220220
PMCID: PMC4142680
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 2 April 2014 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jonathan Eric Rosenberg
    510 Rosenberg