Impact of tumor location on prognosis for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma managed by radical nephroureterectomy Journal Article


Authors: Raman, J. D.; Ng, C. K.; Scherr, D. S.; Margulis, V.; Lotan, Y.; Bensalah, K.; Patard, J. J.; Kikuchi, E.; Montorsi, F.; Zigeuner, R.; Weizer, A.; Bolenz, C.; Koppie, T. M.; Isbarn, H.; Jeldres, C.; Kabbani, W.; Remzi, M.; Waldert, M.; Wood, C. G.; Roscigno, M.; Oya, M.; Langner, C.; Wolf, J. S.; Ströbel, P.; Fernandez, M.; Karakiewcz, P.; Shariat, S. F.
Article Title: Impact of tumor location on prognosis for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma managed by radical nephroureterectomy
Abstract: Background: There is a lack of consensus regarding the prognostic significance of ureteral versus renal pelvic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Objective: To investigate the association of tumor location on outcomes for UTUC in an international cohort of patients managed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective review of institutional databases from 10 institutions worldwide identified patients with UTUC. Intervention: The 1249 patients in the study underwent RNU with ipsilateral bladder cuff resection between 1987 and 2007. Measurements: Data accrued included age, gender, race, surgical approach (open vs laparoscopic), tumor pathology (stage, grade, lymph node status), tumor location, use of perioperative chemotherapy, prior endoscopic therapy, urothelial carcinoma recurrence, and mortality from urothelial carcinoma. Tumor location was divided into two groups (renal pelvis and ureter) based on the location of the dominant tumor. Results and limitations: The 5-yr recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival estimates for this cohort were 75% and 78%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, only pathologic tumor (pT) classification (p < 0.001), grade (p < 0.02), and lymph node status (p < 0.001) were associated with disease recurrence and cancer-specific survival. When adjusting for these variables, there was no difference in the probability of disease recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.22; p = 0.133) or cancer death (HR: 1.23; p = 0.25) between ureteral and renal pelvic tumors. Adding tumor location to a base prognostic model for disease recurrence and cancer death that included pT stage, tumor grade, and lymph node status only improved the predictive accuracy of this model by 0.1%. This study is limited by biases associated with its retrospective design. Conclusions: There is no difference in outcomes between patients with renal pelvic tumors and with ureteral tumors following nephroureterectomy. These data support the current TNM staging system, whereby renal pelvic and ureteral carcinomas are classified as one integral group of tumors. © 2009 European Association of Urology.
Keywords: survival; adult; cancer survival; controlled study; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; surgical technique; retrospective studies; major clinical study; cancer localization; cancer recurrence; cancer staging; outcome assessment; lymph node metastasis; neoplasm staging; cancer grading; proportional hazards models; cohort analysis; recurrence; surgical approach; data base; retrospective study; prediction; kidney neoplasms; nephrectomy; cancer mortality; urothelium; probability; urothelial carcinoma; nephroureterectomy; carcinoma; endoscopic therapy; multivariate analysis; perioperative period; hazard ratio; ureter; cancer classification; kidney pelvis carcinoma; ureter carcinoma; kidney pelvis; urinary tract carcinoma; multicenter studies as topic; kaplan-meier estimate; renal pelvis; urethral neoplasms
Journal Title: European Urology
Volume: 57
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0302-2838
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2010-06-01
Start Page: 1072
End Page: 1079
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.002
PUBMED: 19619934
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 5" - "Export Date: 20 April 2011" - "CODEN: EUURA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Shahrokh Shariat
    68 Shariat