Meeting the 12 lymph node (LN) benchmark in colon cancer Journal Article


Authors: Rajput, A.; Romanus, D.; Weiser, M. R.; ter Veer, A.; Niland, J.; Wilson, J.; Skibber, J. M.; Wong, Y. N.; Benson, A.; Earle, C. C.; Schrag, D.
Article Title: Meeting the 12 lymph node (LN) benchmark in colon cancer
Abstract: Background: Examining ≥12 LN in colon cancer has been suggested as a quality metric. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the 12 LN benchmark is achieved at NCCN centers compared to a US population-based sample. Methods: Patients with stage I-III disease resected at NCCN centers were identified from a prospective database (n=718) and were compared to 12,845 stage I-III patients diagnosed in a SEER region. Age, gender, location, stage, number of positive nodes were compared for NCCN and SEER data in regards to number of nodes evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to identify factors associated with evaluating 12 LNs. Results: 92% of NCCN and 58% of SEER patients had ≥12 LN evaluated. For patients treated at NCCN centers, factors associated with not meeting the 12 LN target were left-sided tumors, stage I disease and BMI >30. Conclusions: ≥12 LN are almost always evaluated in NCCN patients. In contrast, this target is achieved in 58% of SEER patients. With longer follow-up of the NCCN cohort we will be able to link this quality metric to patterns of recurrence and survival and thereby better understand whether increasing the number of nodes evaluated is a priority for cancer control. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; human tissue; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; cancer surgery; young adult; major clinical study; cancer localization; united states; cancer staging; follow up; lymph nodes; lymphatic metastasis; neoplasm staging; prospective studies; lymphadenectomy; quality control; cohort studies; colonic neoplasms; cohort analysis; body mass; evaluation; colon cancer; benchmarking; seer program; databases, factual; outcomes
Journal Title: Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume: 102
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0022-4790
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2010-07-01
Start Page: 3
End Page: 9
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/jso.21532
PUBMED: 20578172
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 2" - "Export Date: 20 April 2011" - "CODEN: JSONA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Martin R Weiser
    534 Weiser