MR imaging features of triple-negative breast cancers Journal Article


Authors: Sung, J. S.; Jochelson, M. S.; Brennan, S.; Joo, S.; Wen, Y. H.; Moskowitz, C.; Zheng, J.; Dershaw, D. D.; Morris, E. A.
Article Title: MR imaging features of triple-negative breast cancers
Abstract: Triple-negative (TN) breast cancers, which are associated with a more aggressive clinical course and poorer prognosis, often present with benign imaging features on mammography and ultrasound. The purpose of this study was to compare the magnetic resonance imaging features of TN breast cancers with estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) negative cancers. Retrospective review identified 140 patients with TN breast cancer who underwent a preoperative breast MRI between 2003 and 2008. Comparison was made to 181 patients with ER+/PR+/HER2- cancer. Breast MRIs were independently reviewed by two radiologists blinded to the pathology. Discrepancies were resolved by a third radiologist. TN cancers presented with a larger tumor size (p = 0.002), higher histologic grade (<0.001), and were more likely to be unifocal (p = 0.018) compared with ER+/PR+/HER2- tumors. MRI features associated with TN tumors included mass enhancement (p = 0.026), areas of intratumoral high T2 signal intensity (p < 0.001), lobulated shape (p < 0.001), rim enhancement (p < 0.001), and smooth margins (p = 0.005). Among the TN tumors with marked necrosis, 26% showed a large central acellular zone of necrosis. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: breast cancer; triple negative; mri; tn
Journal Title: Breast Journal
Volume: 19
Issue: 6
ISSN: 1075-122X
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2013-11-01
Start Page: 643
End Page: 649
Language: English
DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12182
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 24015869
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 2 December 2013" - "CODEN: BRJOF" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Junting Zheng
    200 Zheng
  2. Janice Sinae Sung
    67 Sung
  3. D David Dershaw
    223 Dershaw
  4. Elizabeth A Morris
    336 Morris
  5. Maxine Jochelson
    134 Jochelson
  6. Chaya S. Moskowitz
    278 Moskowitz
  7. Hannah Yong Wen
    301 Wen
  8. Sandra B Brennan
    40 Brennan