Focal treatment or observation of prostate cancer: Pretreatment accuracy of transrectal ultrasound biopsy and T(2)-weighted MRI Journal Article


Authors: Nogueira, L.; Wang, L.; Fine, S. W.; Pinochet, R; Kurta, J. M.; Katz, D.; Savage, C. J.; Cronin, A. M.; Hricak, H.; Scardino, P. T.; Akin, O.; Coleman, J. A.
Article Title: Focal treatment or observation of prostate cancer: Pretreatment accuracy of transrectal ultrasound biopsy and T(2)-weighted MRI
Abstract: Objectives: To test the hypothesis that men with prostate cancer (PCA) and preoperative disease features considered favorable for focal treatment would be accurately characterized with transrectal biopsy and prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by performing a retrospective analysis of a selected cohort of such patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: A total of 202 patients with PCA who had preoperative MRI and low-risk biopsy criteria (no Gleason grade 4/5, 1 involved core, <2 mm, PSA density ≤0.10, clinical stage ≤T2a) were included in the study. Indolent RP pathology was defined as no Gleason 4/5, organ confined, tumor volume <0.5 mL, and negative surgical margins. MRI ability to locate and determine the tumor extent was assessed. Results: After RP, 101 men (50%) had nonindolent cancer. Multifocal and bilateral tumors were present in 81% and 68% of patients, respectively. MRI indicated extensive disease in 16 (8%). MRI sensitivity to locate PCA ranged from 2% to 20%, and specificity from 91% to 95%. On univariate analysis, MRI evidence of extracapsular extension (P = .027) and extensive disease (P = .001) were associated with nonindolent cancer. On multivariate analysis, only the latter remained as significant predictor (P = .0018). Conclusions: Transrectal biopsy identified men with indolent tumors favorable for focal treatment in 50% of cases. MRI findings of extracapsular extension and extensive tumor involving more than half of the gland are associated with unfavorable features, and may be useful in excluding patients from focal treatment. According to these data, endorectal MRI is not sufficient to localize small tumors for focal treatment. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; middle aged; retrospective studies; major clinical study; cancer risk; cancer staging; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; preoperative evaluation; accuracy; reproducibility of results; biopsy; prostate cancer; gleason score; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; prostate biopsy; transrectal ultrasonography; diffusion weighted imaging; ultrasonography; rectum; rectum biopsy
Journal Title: Urology
Volume: 75
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0090-4295
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2010-02-01
Start Page: 472
End Page: 477
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.061
PUBMED: 19643467
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC3651887
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 4" - "Export Date: 20 April 2011" - "CODEN: URGYA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jonathan Coleman
    346 Coleman
  2. Caroline Savage
    80 Savage
  3. Peter T Scardino
    671 Scardino
  4. Darren Jonathan Katz
    43 Katz
  5. Jordan Kurta
    8 Kurta
  6. Angel M Cronin
    145 Cronin
  7. Hedvig Hricak
    421 Hricak
  8. Liang Wang
    35 Wang
  9. Samson W Fine
    463 Fine
  10. Oguz Akin
    270 Akin