Phase III randomized study of rituximab/carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) compared with iodine-131 tositumomab/BEAM with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the BMT CTN 0401 trial Journal Article


Authors: Vose, J. M.; Carter, S.; Burns, L. J.; Ayala, E.; Press, O. W.; Moskowitz, C. H.; Stadtmauer, E. A.; Mineshi, S.; Ambinder, R.; Fenske, T.; Horowitz, M.; Fisher, R.; Tomblyn, M.
Article Title: Phase III randomized study of rituximab/carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) compared with iodine-131 tositumomab/BEAM with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the BMT CTN 0401 trial
Abstract: This clinical trial evaluated standard-dose radioimmunotherapy with a chemotherapy-based transplantation regimen followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation versus rituximab with the same regimen in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients with chemotherapy-sensitive persistent or relapsed DLBCL were randomly assigned to receive iodine-131 tositumomab (dosimetric dose of 5 mCi on day -19 and therapeutic dose of 0.75 Gy on day -12), carmustine 300 mg/m(2) (day -6), etoposide 100 mg/m(2) twice daily (days -5 to -2), cytarabine 100 mg/m(2) twice daily (days -5 to -2), and melphalan 140 mg/m(2) (day -1; B-BEAM) or rituximab 375 mg/m(2) on days -19 and -12 and the same chemotherapy regimen (R-BEAM). Two hundred twenty-four patients were enrolled, with 113 patients randomly assigned to R-BEAM and 111 patients assigned to B-BEAM. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates, the primary end point, were 48.6% (95% CI, 38.6% to 57.8%) for R-BEAM and 47.9% (95% CI, 38.2% to 57%; P = .94) for B-BEAM, and the 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 65.6% (95% CI, 55.3% to 74.1%) for R-BEAM and 61% (95% CI, 50.9% to 69.9%; P = .38) for B-BEAM. The 100-day treatment-related mortality rates were 4.1% (95% CI, 0.2% to 8.0%) for R-BEAM and 4.9% (95% CI, 0.8% to 9.0%; P = .97) for B-BEAM. The maximum mucositis score was higher in the B-BEAM arm (0.72) compared with the R-BEAM arm (0.31; P < .001). The B-BEAM and R-BEAM regimens produced similar 2-year PFS and OS rates for patients with chemotherapy-sensitive relapsed DLBCL. No differences in toxicities other than mucositis were noted.
Keywords: adolescent; adult; controlled study; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; young adult; multimodality cancer therapy; combined modality therapy; cytarabine; rituximab; methodology; antineoplastic agent; prospective study; prospective studies; controlled clinical trial; etoposide; randomized controlled trial; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; recurrence; melphalan; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; carmustine; monoclonal antibody; antibodies, monoclonal; multicenter study; recurrent disease; phase 3 clinical trial; large cell lymphoma; lymphoma, large b-cell, diffuse; radioimmunotherapy; transplantation, autologous; autotransplantation; antibodies, monoclonal, murine-derived; iodine 131 anti b1 antibody; iodine-131 anti-b1 antibody; very elderly
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 31
Issue: 13
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2013-05-01
Start Page: 1662
End Page: 1668
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.45.9453
PUBMED: 23478060
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC3635682
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - Cited By (since 1996):1 - "Export Date: 2 December 2013" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Craig Moskowitz
    407 Moskowitz