Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma Journal Article


Authors: Motzer, R. J.; Hutson, T. E.; Cella, D.; Reeves, J.; Hawkins, R.; Guo, J.; Nathan, P.; Staehler, M.; Souza, P.; Merchan, J. R.; Boleti, E.; Fife, K.; Jin, J.; Jones, R.; Uemura, H.; De Giorgi, U.; Harmenberg, U.; Wang, J.; Sternberg, C. N.; Deen, K.; McCann, L.; Hackshaw, M. D.; Crescenzo, R.; Pandite, L. N.; Choueiri, T. K.
Article Title: Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Pazopanib and sunitinib provided a progression-free survival benefit, as compared with placebo or interferon, in previous phase 3 studies involving patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. This phase 3, randomized trial compared the efficacy and safety of pazopanib and sunitinib as first-line therapy. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1110 patients with clear-cell, metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive a continuous dose of pazopanib (800 mg once daily; 557 patients) or sunitinib in 6-week cycles (50 mg once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment; 553 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by independent review, and the study was powered to show the noninferiority of pazopanib versus sunitinib. Secondary end points included overall survival, safety, and quality of life. RESULTS: Pazopanib was noninferior to sunitinib with respect to progression-free survival (hazard ratio for progression of disease or death from any cause, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.22), meeting the predefined noninferiority margin (upper bound of the 95% confidence interval, <1.25). Overall survival was similar (hazard ratio for death with pazopanib, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.08). Patients treated with sunitinib, as compared with those treated with pazopanib, had a higher incidence of fatigue (63% vs. 55%), the hand-foot syndrome (50% vs. 29%), and thrombocytopenia (78% vs. 41%); patients treated with pazopanib had a higher incidence of increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (60%, vs. 43% with sunitinib). The mean change from baseline in 11 of 14 health-related quality-of-life domains, particularly those related to fatigue or soreness in the mouth, throat, hands, or feet, during the first 6 months of treatment favored pazopanib (P<0.05 for all 11 comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Pazopanib and sunitinib have similar efficacy, but the safety and quality-of-life profiles favor pazopanib. Copyright © 2013 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; controlled study; disease-free survival; major clinical study; overall survival; constipation; fatigue; neutropenia; sunitinib; dose response; drug dose reduction; drug efficacy; drug safety; hypophosphatemia; side effect; outcome assessment; progression free survival; quality of life; drug eruption; multiple cycle treatment; anemia; leukopenia; randomized controlled trial; stomatitis; thrombocytopenia; clinical assessment; weight reduction; pyrimidines; risk factor; kidney neoplasms; risk assessment; drug fever; hypomagnesemia; lymphocytopenia; hair color; hypermagnesemia; hypoalbuminemia; adverse outcome; carcinoma, renal cell; sulfonamides; pazopanib; peripheral edema; limb pain; skin disease; phase 3 clinical trial; hypothyroidism; gastroesophageal reflux; indoles; pyrroles; double-blind method; dyspepsia; hand foot syndrome; angiogenesis inhibitors; alopecia; epistaxis; kidney metastasis; lactate dehydrogenase blood level; mucosal disease; mouth pain; dysgeusia; sore throat; kaplan-meier estimate; thyrotropin blood level; foot pain; hand pain
Journal Title: New England Journal of Medicine
Volume: 369
Issue: 8
ISSN: 0028-4793
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society  
Date Published: 2013-08-22
Start Page: 722
End Page: 731
Language: English
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303989
PUBMED: 23964934
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 1 October 2013" - "CODEN: NEJMA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Robert Motzer
    1243 Motzer