Trends in the surgical treatment of pathologic proximal femur fractures among Musculoskeletal Tumor Society members Journal Article


Authors: Steensma, M.; Healey, J. H.
Article Title: Trends in the surgical treatment of pathologic proximal femur fractures among Musculoskeletal Tumor Society members
Abstract: Several strategies for the treatment of pathologic proximal femur fractures are practiced but treatment outcomes have not been rigorously compared. Major variations in the use of intramedullary fixation, extramedullary/plate-screw fixation, and endoprosthetic reconstruction techniques for pathologic proximal femur fractures in patients with skeletal metastases are reported. The clinical and surgical variables that influence this choice differ among treating surgeons. To characterize the technique preferences and to identify areas of consensus regarding specific clinical presentations, we administered an online survey to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) membership. We also tested whether responses correlated with the respondents' years in practice and asked about the indications for wide tumor resection and the role of tumor debulking and adjuvant cementation. A 10-minute, web-based survey was sent via email to 244 MSTS members. The survey queried participants' musculoskeletal oncology training and experience and presented case scenarios illustrating different combinations of four variables that influence decision-making: cancer type, estimated patient survival, fracture displacement, and anatomic region of involvement. Forty-one percent (n = 98) of MSTS members completed the survey. Intramedullary nail fixation (IMN; 45%) and proximal femur resection and reconstruction (34%) were the most commonly recommended techniques followed by long-stem cemented hemiarthroplasty/cemented hemiarthroplasty (15%) and open reduction and internal fixation (7%). Most respondents (56%) recommended use of cementation with IMN. Differences of opinion on recommended treatment were associated with variations in cancer type, fracture displacement, and anatomic region of involvement. Our online survey showed a trend among MSTS members for selecting IMN and arthroplasty-related techniques to treat pathologic fractures of the proximal femur, but major differences in preferred operative technique exist. Prospective studies are needed to develop consistent, evidence-based treatment recommendations.
Keywords: bone neoplasms; bone tumor; limb salvage; arthroplasty, replacement; reconstructive surgical procedures; plastic surgery; methodology; metastasis; internet; pathology; oncology; information processing; data collection; societies, medical; medical society; medical oncology; arthroplasty; orthopedics; equipment; bone screw; bone screws; fracture fixation; intramedullary nailing; femur neck fracture; femoral neck fractures; bone plate; external fixator; bone plates; external fixators; fracture fixation, intramedullary
Journal Title: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Volume: 471
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0009-921X
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2013-06-01
Start Page: 2000
End Page: 2006
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2724-6
PUBMED: 23247815
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC3706680
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 25 September 2013" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. John H Healey
    547 Healey