Radical vaginal versus abdominal trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: A comparison of surgical and pathologic outcomes Journal Article


Authors: Einstein, M. H.; Park, K. J.; Sonoda, Y.; Carter, J.; Chi, D. S.; Barakat, R. R.; Abu-Rustum, N. R.
Article Title: Radical vaginal versus abdominal trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: A comparison of surgical and pathologic outcomes
Abstract: Objectives: To compare the surgical and pathologic outcomes utilizing two surgical approaches for fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Methods: A prospectively maintained database of vaginal radical trachelectomy (VRT) and abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART) procedures was analyzed. All procedures were performed in a standardized manner by the same surgical group. Parametrial measurements were recorded from the final pathology report. Standard statistical tests were used. Results: Between 12/2001 and 7/2007, 43 adult patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer underwent surgery with the intent to perform a fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy. VRT was attempted in 28 patients (65%) and ART in 15 patients (35%). The median measured parametrial length in the VRT group was 1.45 cm compared to 3.97 cm in the ART group, P < 0.0001. None of the parametrial specimens in the VRT group contained parametrial nodes. Parametrial nodes were detected in 8 (57.3%) of the ART specimens (P = 0.0002). There was no difference in histologic subtypes, lymph vascular space invasion, or median total regional lymph nodes removed in the two groups. Median blood loss was greater but not clinically significant in the ART group, and median operating time was less in the ART group. The overall complication rate was not significantly different in the two groups. Conclusions: Using standardized techniques, radical abdominal trachelectomy provides similar surgical and pathologic outcomes with possibly a wider parametrial resection, including contiguous parametrial nodes, as compared to the radical vaginal approach. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; clinical article; controlled study; human tissue; treatment outcome; cancer surgery; retrospective studies; young adult; comparative study; cancer staging; outcome assessment; neoplasm staging; lymphadenectomy; bleeding; vagina; surgical approach; histology; statistical analysis; abdomen; uterine cervix cancer; operation duration; intermethod comparison; gynecologic surgical procedures; abdominal trachelectomy; pathologic; radical trachelectomy; stage ib1 cervical cancer; surgical; vaginal trachelectomy; abdominal radical trachelectomy; fertility; time series analysis; vaginal radical trachelectomy; uterine cervical neoplasms
Journal Title: Gynecologic Oncology
Volume: 112
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0090-8258
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2009-01-01
Start Page: 73
End Page: 77
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.007
PUBMED: 18973933
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC4994890
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 13" - "Export Date: 30 November 2010" - "CODEN: GYNOA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Richard R Barakat
    629 Barakat
  2. Dennis S Chi
    707 Chi
  3. Yukio Sonoda
    472 Sonoda
  4. Kay Jung Park
    305 Park
  5. Jeanne Carter
    159 Carter