Relationship between intraoperative fluid administration and perioperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Results of a prospective randomized trial of acute normovolemic hemodilution compared with standard intraoperative management Journal Article


Authors: Fischer, M.; Matsuo, K.; Gonen, M.; Grant, F.; DeMatteo, R. P.; D'Angelica, M. I.; Mascarenhas, J.; Brennan, M. F.; Allen, P. J.; Blumgart, L. H.; Jarnagin, W. R.
Article Title: Relationship between intraoperative fluid administration and perioperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Results of a prospective randomized trial of acute normovolemic hemodilution compared with standard intraoperative management
Abstract: Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) can be associated with significant blood loss and transfusion requirements, with potential adverse short- and long-term consequences. The aim of this study was to determine whether acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH), an established blood conservation technique, reduces perioperative allogeneic transfusions in patients undergoing PD. Methods: One hundred thirty patients undergoing PD were randomized to ANH or standard management (STDM). In the ANH group, intraoperative blood collection was performed to a target hemoglobin of 8.0 g/dL; crystalloid and colloid were used for volume replacement. Strict transfusion triggers were applied during and after operation. Perioperative complications were prospectively assessed and graded for severity. Results: From July 2005 to May 2009, 209 patients were registered, 79 excluded, 65 were randomized to ANH, and 65 to STD. The groups were well matched for demographic, operative, and histopathologic variables. Patients undergoing ANH received over 2 L more fluid intraoperatively (6250 mL, range 2000-11850) compared with patients undergoing STD (3900 mL, range 2000-9000) (P < 0.001). Transfusion rates were similar (ANH = 16.9%, 30 units vs STD = 18.5%, 33 units; P = 0.82), as was overall perioperative morbidity (ANH = 49.2% vs STD = 47%, P = 0.86). There was, however, a trend toward more grade-3 complications in patients undergoing ANH (32% vs 23.1% STD, P = 0.17), and complications related to the pancreatic anastomosis (leak/fistula/abscess) were significantly higher in the ANH group (21.5% vs 7.7%, P = 0.045). The intraoperative fluid volume was higher for all patients with pancreatic anastomotic complications (n = 19), regardless of randomization arm (ANH 6000 mL, range 2800-11350 mL vs STD 5000 mL, range 2000-11850 mL, P < 0.042). Conclusion: In this randomized trial of patients undergoing PD, ANH did not reduce allogeneic transfusions and resulted in more pancreatic anastomotic complications, likely related to greater intraoperative fluid administration. The benefits of ANH do not necessarily extend to all procedures, and restrictive intravenous fluid management during PD may help improve postoperative outcome. Copyright © 2010 by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; treatment outcome; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; antibiotic agent; major clinical study; clinical trial; mortality; comparative study; pancreas cancer; prospective study; prospective studies; pancreaticoduodenectomy; controlled clinical trial; bleeding; randomized controlled trial; fluid therapy; morbidity; clinical protocol; length of stay; hemodilution; intraoperative period; patient safety; blood transfusion; octreotide; antibiotic prophylaxis; peroperative care; bile duct cancer; acute normovolemic hemodilution; normosol; colloid; crystalloid; duodenum cancer
Journal Title: Annals of Surgery
Volume: 252
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0003-4932
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2010-12-01
Start Page: 952
End Page: 958
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ff36b1
PUBMED: 21107104
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 20 April 2011" - "CODEN: ANSUA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Murray F Brennan
    1059 Brennan
  2. Mary Ellen Fischer
    30 Fischer
  3. Florence Grant
    15 Grant
  4. Leslie H Blumgart
    352 Blumgart
  5. Ronald P DeMatteo
    637 DeMatteo
  6. Mithat Gonen
    1028 Gonen
  7. Kenichi Matsuo
    5 Matsuo
  8. Peter Allen
    501 Allen
  9. William R Jarnagin
    903 Jarnagin