Reply from authors re: Amnon Zisman. Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: Is it always as good as open nephroureterectomy? Eur Urol 2010;58:652-3 Journal Article

  

Authors:	Favaretto, R. L.; Coleman, J.; Dalbagni, G.
Article Title:	Reply from authors re: Amnon Zisman. Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: Is it always as good as open nephroureterectomy? Eur Urol 2010;58:652-3
Keywords:	treatment outcome; excision; surgical technique; survival rate; major clinical study; patient selection; note; cancer adjuvant therapy; cancer staging; lymph node dissection; laparoscopic surgery; lymphadenectomy; bleeding; morbidity; surgical approach; retrospective study; length of stay; cancer size; nephroureterectomy; blood transfusion; outcomes research; intermethod comparison; upper tract urothelial carcinoma; cystoscopy; ureter; cancer control; urinary tract carcinoma
Journal Title:	European Urology
Volume:	58
Issue:	5
ISSN:	0302-2838
Publisher:	Elsevier Science, Inc.
Date Published:	2010-11-01
Start Page:	653
End Page:	654
Language:	English
DOI:	10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.037
PROVIDER:	scopus
DOI/URL:	http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77957590932&partnerID=40&md5=2a4c98e6d142e9374b39369ff1aeb4a9
Notes:	--- - "Export Date: 20 April 2011" - "CODEN: EUURA" - "Source: Scopus"

https://synapse.mskcc.org/synapse/works/has_related_data_chk/4040