Better late than never? Impact of local analgesia timing on postoperative pain in laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and metaanalysis Journal Article


Authors: Coughlin, S. M.; Karanicolas, P. J.; Emmerton-Coughlin, H. M. A.; Kanbur, B.; Kanbur, S.; Colquhoun, P. H. D.
Article Title: Better late than never? Impact of local analgesia timing on postoperative pain in laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and metaanalysis
Abstract: Background: This study aimed to determine the effect of local anesthesia administered before laparoscopic surgery (preemptive anesthesia) on postoperative pain. Methods: The authors searched Medline, EMBase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, as well as reference lists of textbooks and relevant articles. They contacted experts in the field of anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery for randomized controlled trials comparing preemptive administration of local anesthesia at the incision site or intraperitoneally with postoperative anesthesia administration or placebo. Trials were systematically assessed for eligibility and validity, and data were extracted in duplicate. The data were pooled across studies using a random effects model. Results: The 26 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. Preemptive incisional local anesthetic was superior to placebo in terms of visual analog pain scores (VAS) at 4 h (weighted mean difference [WMD], -9.49 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15.50 to -3.48) and 24 h (WMD, -4.75 mm; 95%CI, -8.90 to 0.60). However, no difference was found between these measures and those for postoperative incision-site infiltration. Preemptive intraperitoneal local anesthetic was superior to placebo in terms of VAS at 4 h (WMD, 5.76 mm; 95%CI, -11.27 to -0.25), 8 h (WMD, -9.64 mm; 95%CI, -13.68 to -5.60), 12 h (WMD, -4.68 mm; 95%CI, -5.86 to -3.49), and 24 h (WMD, -5.57 mm; 95%CI, -8.35 to -2.79), and superior to postoperative anesthesia administration at 8 h (WMD, -7.42; 95%CI, -13.40 to -1.45), 12 h (WMD, -7.27 mm; 95%CI, -10.26 to -4.28), and 24 h (WMD, -7.95 mm; 95%CI, -12.33 to -3.56). Conclusion: Preemptive administration of local anesthetic at the incision site reduces postoperative pain compared with placebo but achieves an analgesic effect similar to that of postincisional anesthetic infiltration. Preemptive local anesthetic administered intraperitoneally decreases postoperative pain compared with both placebo and postoperative infiltration. Surgeons should use local analgesia in laparoscopic surgery to decrease postoperative pain, but the timing of administration is significant only for intraperitoneal infiltration. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Keywords: treatment response; clinical trial; placebo; drug efficacy; outcome assessment; laparoscopy; laparoscopic surgery; controlled clinical trial; randomized controlled trial; time factors; systematic review; dosage schedule comparison; therapy delay; analgesia; pain assessment; postoperative pain; visual analog scale; pain, postoperative; meta analysis; local anesthetic agent; drug indication; postoperative analgesia; metaanalysis; local anesthesia; preemptive analgesia
Journal Title: Surgical Endoscopy
Volume: 24
Issue: 12
ISSN: 0930-2794
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2010-12-01
Start Page: 3167
End Page: 3176
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1111-1
PUBMED: 20490560
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 20 April 2011" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors