Value of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair proteins in predicting germline mutation in hereditary colorectal neoplasms Journal Article


Authors: Shia, J.; Klimstra, D. S.; Nafa, K.; Offit, K.; Guillem, J. G.; Markowitz, A. J.; Gerald, W. L.; Ellis, N. A.
Article Title: Value of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair proteins in predicting germline mutation in hereditary colorectal neoplasms
Abstract: The utility of immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening method for the identification of persons with mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) remains to be defined. In this study, we analyzed the value of IHC versus that of microsatellite instability (MSI) testing in predicting mutation status of the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes in colorectal carcinomas and adenomas, and explored the frequency and significance of immunohistochemical staining variability. The study samples included 83 carcinomas and 29 adenomas derived from 110 patients who had strong family histories of colorectal cancer. Our results showed that IHC correctly predicted MSI status in 76% of the cases with a specificity of 100%. The overall sensitivity of IHC in predicting a germline mutation was 79% (30 of 38) with a specificity of 89% (48 of 54), whereas that of MSI testing was 97% (30 of 31) with a specificity of 83% (35 of 42). Six of 31 analyzable cases that had a disease-causing mutation and exhibited MSI showed normal IHC. The lower sensitivity of IHC was caused mainly by its low sensitivity in detecting MLH1 gene mutation (4 of 9). Coexisting adenomas and carcinomas observed in the same slide (n = 12) showed a similar or identical staining pattern for all three proteins. No significant difference was detected in the sensitivity of IHC or MSI in detecting a germline mutation between isolated adenomas and carcinomas. In IHC-positive cases, heterogeneous staining was noted in 30% to 40% of the cases with the three different antibodies, and cytoplasmic staining in 5% to 13%. Weak IHC (defined as positive staining in <10% of the tumor with weak intensity) was noted in 14 tumors: 5 for the MLH1 antibody, 1 for MSH2, and 8 for MSH6. One of the 5 MLH1 cases exhibited MSI and had an MLH1 germline mutation. Five of the 8 MSH6 cases exhibited MSI and had MSH2 germline mutations. In conclusion, our study shows that 1) IHC identifies a significant portion of colorectal tumors derived from MMR gene germline mutation carriers and can be used as an adjunct measure in the identification of HNPCC families, but IHC cannot replace MSI testing; 2) adenomas have similar MMR protein expression patterns as carcinomas and may serve as an adequate sample for screening purposes in the identification of patients with MMR mutations; 3) not all IHC-positive cases show uniform positivity throughout the tumor; and 4) weak and focal staining of an MMR protein may be associated with MSI or gene mutation or both, suggesting the need to incorporate staining intensity in further IHC studies.
Keywords: immunohistochemistry; adult; controlled study; human tissue; aged; middle aged; cancer surgery; gene mutation; major clinical study; dna-binding proteins; proto-oncogene proteins; colorectal cancer; adenocarcinoma; protein analysis; gene; neoplasm proteins; tumor markers, biological; nuclear proteins; colorectal carcinoma; colorectal neoplasms; immunoenzyme techniques; germ line; adenoma; dna; mismatch repair; microsatellite instability; family history; carrier proteins; dna, neoplasm; dna mutational analysis; protein mlh1; protein msh2; protein msh6; muts homolog 2 protein; polypectomy; germ-line mutation; mlh1 gene; microsatellite repeats; base pair mismatch; msh2 gene; msh6 gene
Journal Title: American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Volume: 29
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0147-5185
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2005-01-01
Start Page: 96
End Page: 104
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000146009.85309.3b
PUBMED: 15613860
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 63" - "Export Date: 24 October 2012" - "CODEN: AJSPD" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Kenneth Offit
    789 Offit
  2. Arnold J Markowitz
    139 Markowitz
  3. Khedoudja Nafa
    243 Nafa
  4. Nathan A Ellis
    74 Ellis
  5. Jose Guillem
    414 Guillem
  6. William L Gerald
    375 Gerald
  7. David S Klimstra
    978 Klimstra
  8. Jinru Shia
    720 Shia