Keywords: |
clinical trial; review; note; positron emission tomography; methodology; cancer diagnosis; diagnostic accuracy; sensitivity and specificity; clinical practice; neoplasm; neoplasms; reproducibility; reproducibility of results; computer assisted tomography; image interpretation, computer-assisted; observer variation; tomography, x-ray computed; practice guideline; diagnostic imaging; health care quality; patient care; radiologist; computer assisted diagnosis; image enhancement; image subtraction; subtraction technique; quality assurance, health care; incidental findings; fluorodeoxyglucose f 18; computer assisted emission tomography; positron-emission tomography; intermethod comparison; incidental finding; image processing; breath holding; radiodiagnosis; professional competence; clinical trials; barium sulfate
|