Caudate hepatectomy for cancer: A single institution experience with 150 patients Journal Article


Authors: Hawkins, W. G.; DeMatteo, R. P.; Cohen, M. S.; Jarnagin, W. R.; Fong, Y.; D'Angelica, M.; Gonen, M.; Blumgart, L. H.
Article Title: Caudate hepatectomy for cancer: A single institution experience with 150 patients
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Resection of the caudate lobe of the liver is technically demanding, with the disparate goals of preserving major vascular and biliary structures without compromising tumor clearance. Our objective was to assess our results with resection of the caudate lobe of the liver for malignant disease. STUDY DESIGN: From 1992 to 2004, we performed caudate resection for malignancy in 150 patients. Clinicopathologic correlates, surgical methods, patterns of recurrence, and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 150 patients identified, 21 (14%) underwent an isolated caudate lobe resection and 129 (86%) underwent caudate lobe resection as part of a more extensive hepatectomy. The most common indication was for metastatic colorectal cancer (48%), followed by cholangiocarcinoma (30%) and hepatocellular cancer (10%). Thirty patients required resection and reconstruction of the portal vein (n = 16), vena cava (n = 15), or both. Pathologic microscopic margins were positive in 30 patients (20%). At least one postoperative complication was reported in the majority of patients (55%), and nine patients (6%) died as a result of these complications. Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in patients who underwent a major vascular reconstruction (20% versus 2.5%, p < 0.002). Median survivals for patients with colorectal metastasis, cholangiocarcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma were 37, 28, and 32 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Performing caudate hepatectomy with negative microscopic margins remains a technical challenge because of the proximity of major biliary and vascular structures. Although caudate resection of the liver can be performed safely, concomitant major vascular reconstruction substantially increases the mortality of the procedure. © 2005 by the American College of Surgeons.
Keywords: adolescent; adult; cancer survival; child; aged; aged, 80 and over; child, preschool; middle aged; cancer surgery; surgical technique; survival rate; retrospective studies; major clinical study; cancer recurrence; liver cell carcinoma; carcinoma, hepatocellular; liver neoplasms; follow up; colorectal cancer; neoplasm recurrence, local; cancer mortality; postoperative complication; colorectal neoplasms; postoperative complications; correlation analysis; statistical significance; infant; hepatectomy; liver cancer; bile duct carcinoma; bile duct neoplasms; bile ducts, intrahepatic; cholangiocarcinoma; liver lobectomy; portal vein; anastomosis, surgical; vena cava, inferior; intraoperative complications; vascular surgery
Journal Title: Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume: 200
Issue: 3
ISSN: 1072-7515
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2005-03-01
Start Page: 345
End Page: 352
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.10.036
PUBMED: 15737844
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 26" - "Export Date: 24 October 2012" - "CODEN: JACSE" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Leslie H Blumgart
    352 Blumgart
  2. Ronald P DeMatteo
    637 DeMatteo
  3. Mithat Gonen
    1029 Gonen
  4. William G Hawkins
    18 Hawkins
  5. William R Jarnagin
    903 Jarnagin
  6. Yuman Fong
    775 Fong
  7. Michael Cohen
    2 Cohen