Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy Journal Article


Authors: Novara, G.; Ficarra, V.; Rosen, R. C.; Artibani, W.; Costello, A.; Eastham, J. A.; Graefen, M.; Guazzoni, G.; Shariat, S. F.; Stolzenburg, J. U.; Van Poppel, H.; Zattoni, F.; Montorsi, F.; Mottrie, A.; Wilson, T. G.
Article Title: Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Abstract: Context: Perioperative complications are a major surgical outcome for radical prostatectomy (RP). Objective: Evaluate complication rates following robot-assisted RP (RARP), risk factors for complications after RARP, and surgical techniques to improve complication rates after RARP. We also performed a cumulative analysis of all studies comparing RARP with retropubic RP (RRP) or laparoscopic RP (LRP) in terms of perioperative complications. Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of the literature was performed in August 2011, searching Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A free-text protocol using the term radical prostatectomy was applied. The following limits were used: humans; gender (male); and publications dating from January 1, 2008. A cumulative analysis was conducted using Review Manager software v.4.2 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Evidence synthesis: We retrieved 110 papers evaluating oncologic outcomes following RARP. Overall mean operative time is 152 min; mean blood loss is 166 ml; mean transfusion rate is 2%; mean catheterization time is 6.3 d; and mean in-hospital stay is 1.9 d. The mean complication rate was 9%, with most of the complications being of low grade. Lymphocele/lymphorrea (3.1%), urine leak (1.8%), and reoperation (1.6%) are the most prevalent surgical complications. Blood loss (weighted mean difference: 582.77; p < 0.00001) and transfusion rate (odds ratio [OR]: 7.55; p < 0.00001) were lower in RARP than in RRP, whereas only transfusion rate (OR: 2.56; p = 0.005) was lower in RARP than in LRP. All the other analyzed parameters were similar, regardless of the surgical approach. Conclusions: RARP can be performed routinely with a relatively small risk of complications. Surgical experience, clinical patient characteristics, and cancer characteristics may affect the risk of complications. Cumulative analyses demonstrated that blood loss and transfusion rates were significantly lower with RARP than with RRP, and transfusion rates were lower with RARP than with LRP, although all other features were similar regardless of the surgical approach. © 2012 European Association of Urology.
Keywords: treatment outcome; cancer surgery; surgical technique; review; cancer staging; outcome assessment; laparoscopy; laparoscopic surgery; evidence-based medicine; prostate specific antigen; tumor volume; odds ratio; risk factors; deep vein thrombosis; surgical approach; risk factor; time factors; risk assessment; lung embolism; postoperative complications; prostatic neoplasms; length of stay; hospitalization; body mass; medical education; systematic review; prostatectomy; operation duration; surgeon; reoperation; blood transfusion; catheterization; surgical mortality; chi-square distribution; robotics; abdominal surgery; postoperative hemorrhage; anastomosis; hematoma; perioperative complication; urine retention; wound complication; meta analysis; urethra; polyglactin; surgery, computer-assisted; rectum injury; radical retropubic prostatectomy; lymphocele; job experience; robot assisted radical prostatectomy; incision; suture; neurapraxia; lymphorrea; urine leak
Journal Title: European Urology
Volume: 62
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0302-2838
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2012-09-01
Start Page: 431
End Page: 452
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 22749853
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 2" - "Export Date: 4 September 2012" - "CODEN: EUURA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. James Eastham
    538 Eastham