Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: A multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial Journal Article


Authors: Hauschild, A.; Grob, J. J.; Demidov, L. V.; Jouary, T.; Gutzmer, R.; Millward, M.; Rutkowski, P.; Blank, C. U.; Miller, W. H. Jr; Kaempgen, E.; Martín-Algarra, S.; Karaszewska, B.; Mauch, C.; Chiarion-Sileni, V.; Martin, A. M.; Swann, S.; Haney, P.; Mirakhur, B.; Guckert, M. E.; Goodman, V.; Chapman, P. B.
Article Title: Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: A multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial
Abstract: Background Dabrafenib, an inhibitor of mutated BRAF, has clinical activity with a manageable safety profile in studies of phase 1 and 2 in patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma. We studied the efficacy of dabrafenib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic melanoma. Methods We enrolled patients in this open-label phase 3 trial between Dec 23, 2010, and Sept 1, 2011. This report is based on a data cutoff date of Dec 19, 2011. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, stage IV or unresectable stage III BRAF V600E mutation-positive melanoma were randomly assigned (3:1) to receive dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily, orally) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m 2 intravenously every 3 weeks). Patients were stratified according to American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (unresectable III+IVM1a+IVM1b vs IVM1c). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival and was analysed by intention to treat; safety was assessed per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01227889. Findings Of the 733 patients screened, 250 were randomly assigned to receive either dabrafenib (187 patients) or dacarbazine (63 patients). Median progression-free survival was 5 1 months for dabrafenib and 2 7 months for dacarbazine, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0 30 (95% CI 0 18-0 51; p<0 0001). At data cutoff, 107 (57%) patients in the dabrafenib group and 14 (22%) in the dacarbazine group remained on randomised treatment. Treatment-related adverse events (grade 2 or higher) occurred in 100 (53%) of the 187 patients who received dabrafenib and in 26 (44%) of the 59 patients who received dacarbazine. The most common adverse events with dabrafenib were skin-related toxic effects, fever, fatigue, arthralgia, and headache.The most common adverse events with dacarbazine were nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, fatigue, and asthenia. Grade 3-4 adverse events were uncommon in both groups. Interpretation Dabrafenib significantly improved progression-free survival compared with dacarbazine.
Keywords: adult; cancer chemotherapy; cancer survival; controlled study; treatment outcome; treatment response; aged; aged, 80 and over; disease-free survival; middle aged; young adult; gene mutation; major clinical study; mutation; fatigue; neutropenia; drug dose reduction; drug efficacy; drug safety; treatment duration; cancer staging; dacarbazine; melanoma; progression free survival; quality of life; leukopenia; nausea; randomized controlled trial; thrombocytopenia; vomiting; hyperkeratosis; arthralgia; asthenia; fever; drug induced headache; antineoplastic agents, alkylating; open study; phase 3 clinical trial; b raf kinase; proto-oncogene proteins b-raf; imidazoles; dabrafenib; oximes
Journal Title: Lancet
Volume: 380
Issue: 9839
ISSN: 0140-6736
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2012-07-28
Start Page: 358
End Page: 365
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60868-x
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 22735384
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 4 September 2012" - "CODEN: LANCA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
MSK Authors
  1. Paul Chapman
    322 Chapman