Vandetanib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer: A randomized, double-blind phase III trial Journal Article


Authors: Wells, S. A. Jr; Robinson, B. G.; Gagel, R. F.; Dralle, H.; Fagin, J. A.; Santoro, M.; Baudin, E.; Elisei, R.; Jarzab, B.; Vasselli, J. R.; Read, J.; Langmuir, P.; Ryan, A. J.; Schlumberger, M. J.
Article Title: Vandetanib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer: A randomized, double-blind phase III trial
Abstract: Purpose: There is no effective therapy for patients with advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). Vandetanib, a once-daily oral inhibitor of RET kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling, has previously shown antitumor activity in a phase II study of patients with advanced hereditary MTC. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced MTC were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive vandetanib 300 mg/d or placebo. On objective disease progression, patients could elect to receive open-label vandetanib. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), determined by independent central Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) assessments. Results: Between December 2006 and November 2007, 331 patients (mean age, 52 years; 90% sporadic; 95% metastatic) were randomly assigned to receive vandetanib (231) or placebo (100). At data cutoff (July 2009; median follow-up, 24 months), 37% of patients had progressed and 15% had died. The study met its primary objective of PFS prolongation with vandetanib versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.69; P < .001). Statistically significant advantages for vandetanib were also seen for objective response rate (P < .001), disease control rate (P < .001), and biochemical response (P < .001). Overall survival data were immature at data cutoff (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.65). A final survival analysis will take place when 50% of the patients have died. Common adverse events (any grade) occurred more frequently with vandetanib compared with placebo, including diarrhea (56% v 26%), rash (45% v 11%), nausea (33% v 16%), hypertension (32% v 5%), and headache (26% v 9%). Conclusion: Vandetanib demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in a phase III trial of patients with advanced MTC (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00410761). © 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; treatment response; middle aged; major clinical study; overall survival; fatigue; placebo; cancer growth; diarrhea; drug efficacy; hypertension; side effect; follow up; metastasis; progression free survival; nausea; randomized controlled trial; vomiting; abdominal pain; appetite; asthenia; backache; coughing; rash; insomnia; death; disease progression; acne; vandetanib; neoplasm metastasis; thyroid neoplasms; piperidines; dermatitis; headache; phase 3 clinical trial; disease control; double blind procedure; double-blind method; dry skin; quinazolines; biochemistry; placebos; rhinopharyngitis; thyroid medullary carcinoma
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 30
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2012-01-10
Start Page: 134
End Page: 141
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.35.5040
PUBMED: 22025146
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC3675689
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 25" - "Export Date: 24 August 2012" - "CODEN: JCOND" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. James A Fagin
    180 Fagin