Comparison of biochemical failure definitions for permanent prostate brachytherapy Journal Article


Authors: Kuban, D. A.; Levy, L. B.; Potters, L.; Beyer, D. C.; Blasko, J. C.; Moran, B. J.; Ciezki, J. P.; Zietman, A. L.; Zelefsky, M. J.; Pisansky, T. M.; Elshaikh, M.; Horwitz, E. M.
Article Title: Comparison of biochemical failure definitions for permanent prostate brachytherapy
Abstract: Purpose: To assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure definitions for patients with Stage T1-T2 prostate cancer treated by permanent prostate brachytherapy. Methods and Materials: A total of 2,693 patients treated with radioisotopic implant as solitary treatment for T1-T2 prostatic adenocarcinoma were studied. All patients had a pretreatment PSA, were treated at least 5 years before analysis, 1988 to 1998, and did not receive hormonal therapy before recurrence. Multiple PSA failure definitions were tested for their ability to predict clinical failure. Results: Definitions which determined failure by a certain increment of PSA rise above the lowest PSA level to date (nadir + x ng/mL) were more sensitive and specific than failure definitions based on PSA doubling time or a certain number of PSA rises. The sensitivity and specificity for the nadir + 2 definition were 72% and 83%, vs. 51% and 81% for 3 PSA rises. The surgical type definitions (PSA exceeding an absolute value) could match this sensitivity and specificity but only when failure was defined as exceeding a PSA level in the 1-3 ng/mL range and only when patients were allowed adequate time to nadir. When failure definitions were compared by time varying covariate regression analysis, nadir + 2 ng/mL retained the best fit. Conclusions: For patients treated by permanent radioisotopic implant for prostate cancer, the definition nadir + 2 ng/mL provides the best surrogate for failure throughout the entire follow-up period, similar to patients treated by external beam radiotherapy. Therefore, the same PSA failure definition could be used for both modalities. For brachytherapy patients with long-term follow-up, at least 6 years, defining failure as exceeding an absolute PSA level in the 0.5 ng/mL range may be reasonable. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: controlled study; cancer surgery; implant; treatment failure; clinical trial; cancer recurrence; comparative study; cancer staging; follow up; methodology; follow-up studies; sensitivity and specificity; adenocarcinoma; prostate specific antigen; radiotherapy; oncology; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms; blood; prostate; statistical analysis; antigens; iodine 125; isotope labeling; tumors; multicenter study; prostate tumor; biochemical failure; psa; brachytherapy; prostate adenocarcinoma; hormonal therapy; external beam radiotherapy; patient treatment; regression analysis; radioisotopes; biochemistry; palladium 103; hormones; premedication; failure; implants (surgical); prostate-specific antigen (psa)
Journal Title: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Volume: 65
Issue: 5
ISSN: 0360-3016
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2006-08-01
Start Page: 1487
End Page: 1493
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.027
PUBMED: 16750326
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 55" - "Export Date: 4 June 2012" - "CODEN: IOBPD" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Michael J Zelefsky
    754 Zelefsky