Results of the 2005 to 2008 association of residents in radiation oncology surveys of chief residents in the United States: Didactics and research experience Journal Article


Authors: Gondi, V.; Bernard, J. R.; Jabbari, S.; Keam, J.; De Amorim Bernstein, K. L.; Dad, L. K.; Li, L.; Poppe, M. M.; Strauss, J. B.; Chollet, C. T.
Article Title: Results of the 2005 to 2008 association of residents in radiation oncology surveys of chief residents in the United States: Didactics and research experience
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To analyze the didactics and research experience reported by chief residents during their residency training. METHODS: During the academic years 2005 to 2006, 2006 to 2007, and 2007 to 2008, the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) conducted a nationwide survey of all radiation oncology chief residents in the United States. Chi-square statistic was used to assess for changes in didactics and research experience over time. RESULTS: During the years surveyed, an increasing percentage of programs offered curriculum-based didactics in clinical oncology (P=0.042), with a similar trend of borderline significance observed in biostatistics (P = 0.056). Each year, the majority of programs offered >40 hours of curriculum-based training in clinical oncology and physics, >20 hours in radiobiology, and 10 hours or fewer in biostatistics. 11% to 13% of residents reported having no full-time equivalent radiation biologists affiliated with their training program. Less than 64% of programs incorporated mock oral boards into their training. An increasing percentage of programs evaluated residents in a "360 degree" manner, with a trend to significance (P=0.073). Over 80% of programs required resident participation in research activities and allocated dedicated elective research time, typically 4 months or longer. Though the vast majority of programs make clinical research activities available to interested residents, borderline significance (P = 0.051) was observed for a decreasing percentage of such programs during the years analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Trends in didactics and research experience over three years are documented to allow residents and program directors to assess their residency training. Copyright © 2011 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Keywords: residency training; survey; arro; association of residents in radiation oncology; radiation oncology residency
Journal Title: American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 35
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0277-3732
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2012-02-01
Start Page: 32
End Page: 39
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3182005798
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 21278559
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 1 March 2012" - "CODEN: AJCOD" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jennifer Choi Keam
    8 Keam