Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Evolving practice patterns from the national cancer database (2004-2020) Journal Article


Authors: Shih, J. J.; Jain, B.; Patel, R.; Jain, U.; Lam, M.; Chino, F.; Patel, M. I.; Dee, E. C.; Pollom, E.; Li, G.; Taparra, K.
Article Title: Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Evolving practice patterns from the national cancer database (2004-2020)
Abstract: Purpose Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers less neurotoxicity and comparable survival to whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BM). Current SRS practice patterns are understudied. We examined national trends in SRS and WBRT utilization. Methods We queried the National Cancer Database for patients with BM from twelve cancers (>= 18 years; diagnosed 2004-2020) treated with radiotherapy. Patients were grouped by first-course radiotherapy modality (SRS:1-5 fractions; WBRT:5-15 fractions). Multivariable logistic regression assessed SRS predictors, adjusting for sociodemographic and clini-cal variables. A race*diagnosis year interaction evaluated temporal trends. Difference-in-differences analysis assessed Med-icaid expansion impact. Results Of 89,984 patients, 24,174 (27%) received SRS. SRS utilization rose from 8 to 54% between 2004 and 2020 (P < 0.001). SRS was more likely in patients diagnosed in recent years (aOR = 3.85 [95% CI = 3.70-4.01]), who received prior chemotherapy (aOR = 1.17 [1.13-1.21]) or surgery (aOR = 2.25 [2.11-2.40]), and those with colorectal (aOR = 1.93 [1.64-2.26]), lung (aOR = 1.37 [1.24-1.50]), melanoma (aOR = 2.76 [2.46-3.10]), thyroid (aOR = 2.17 [1.36-3.46]), or kidney/bladder cancer (aOR = 2.76 [2.44-3.12]) versus breast cancer. SRS was less likely in patients with lower income (aOR = 0.88 [0.85-0.92]) or educational attainment (aOR = 0.88 [0.85-0.92]), Medicaid/Medicare (aOR = 0.86 [0.83-0.90]), no insurance (aOR = 0.49 [0.44-0.53]), or treatment at community (aOR = 0.31 [0.29-0.34]), comprehensive community (aOR = 0.56 [0.54-0.58]), or integrated facilities (aOR = 0.77 [0.73-0.80]). Race and ethnicity were not overall associated with SRS use. Medicaid expansion had no impact (aOR = 0.99 [0.88-1.10]). Conclusions SRS utilization increased between 2004 and 2020. However, disparities persist for patients with lower socio-economic status, uninsured/public insurance, or non-academic center treatment, potentially reflecting access disparities or differences in disease burden. Targeted efforts are needed to ensure equitable access to advanced cancer therapies, particu-larly in the context of potential additive effects of disparities in disease burden.
Keywords: diagnosis; stereotactic radiosurgery; epidemiology; socioeconomic factors; stage; impact; cell lung-cancer; access; healthcare disparities; disparities; health-insurance; whole brain radiation therapy; insurance status; brain neoplasms / secondary; radiotherapy / trends
Journal Title: Journal of Neuro-Oncology
ISSN: 0167-594X
Publisher: Springer  
Publication status: Online ahead of print
Date Published: 2025-08-01
Online Publication Date: 2025-08-01
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:001556408800001
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-025-05178-8
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 40844729
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledge in the PDF -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Edward Christopher Dee
    298 Dee