Predicting chronic kidney disease after cisplatin treatment using population-level data Journal Article


Authors: Grant, R. C.; He, J. C.; Liu, N.; Podolsky, S.; Notta, F.; Ghassemi, M.; Gallinger, S.; Knezevic, A.; Latcha, S.; Jaimes, E.; Kitchlu, A.; Chan, K.
Article Title: Predicting chronic kidney disease after cisplatin treatment using population-level data
Abstract: Importance Cisplatin is a widely used treatment for cancer that can permanently damage the kidneys. Treatment modifications and other strategies may prevent chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients at risk; however, the incidence and predictability of CKD following cisplatin treatment remain poorly understood. Objective To characterize the incidence of CKD after cisplatin treatment and evaluate prediction models. Design, Setting, and Participants In this population-based prognostic study, prediction models were developed based on a retrospective cohort study of patients who received cisplatin chemotherapy for nonhematologic cancer in an outpatient setting between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2017. Models were tested on a temporal-test cohort of patients from Ontario, Canada, who started treatment between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020, and an external-test cohort of patients from a single center in the United States. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2021 to May 7, 2025. Exposures Predictive features included demographics, cancer diagnosis, cisplatin dose and schedule, comorbidities, laboratory testing, and patient-reported symptoms. Main Outcomes and Measures The outcomes were CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and the eGFR after cisplatin treatment. Measures included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the mean absolute error (MAE). Results The population-level cohort included 9521 patients (median age, 63 years [IQR, 56-70 years]; 4841 men [50.8%]). Among the 9010 patients without pretreatment CKD, 1228 (13.6%) developed CKD, 81 (0.9%) developed grade 4 or worse CKD, and 16 (0.18%) required dialysis. The eGFR decreased by a mean of 8.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI, 7.8-8.4 mL/min/1.73 m2). A simple spline-based regression model based solely on the pretreatment eGFR predicted posttreatment CKD in the temporal-test cohort (area under the curve, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.78-0.82]) and the external-test cohort (area under the curve, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.78]). Similarly, the posttreatment eGFR was predicted by a spline regression based solely on the pretreatment eGFR (temporal-test MAE, 12.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI, 12.3-13.0 mL/min/1.73 m2]; external-test MAE, 14.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI, 13.2-15.5 mL/min/1.73 m2]). Complex machine learning systems incorporating all features failed to improve predictions over the univariable models. Conclusions and Relevance This study found that cisplatin treatment was followed by a predictable decrease in the eGFR, placing patients with a lower baseline eGFR at the highest risk of CKD. A simple model based on the pretreatment eGFR predicts CKD risk and could guide clinical decision-making.
Keywords: validation; model; injury
Journal Title: JAMA Oncology
ISSN: 2374-2437
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Publication status: Online ahead of print
Date Published: 2025-08-21
Online Publication Date: 2025-08-21
Start Page: e252590
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:001556006700001
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.2590
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC12371548
PUBMED: 40839357
Notes: Article; Early Access -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Sheron Latcha
    36 Latcha
  2. Edgar Alberto Jaimes
    83 Jaimes
  3. Andrea Knezevic
    109 Knezevic