The report of AAPM task group 288: Recommendations for guiding radiotherapy event narratives Journal Article
| Authors: | Thomadsen, B.; Kapur, A.; Blankenship, B.; Caldwell, B.; Claps, L.; Cunningham, J.; Elee, J.; Evans, S.; Ford, E.; Gilley, D.; Hayden, S.; Hintenlang, K.; Kapoor, R.; Kildea, J.; Kroger, L.; Kujundzic, K.; Liang, Q.; Mutic, S.; O'Donovan, A.; O'Hara, M.; Ouhib, Z.; Palta, J.; Pawlicki, T.; Salter, W.; Schmidt, S.; Tripathi, S. |
| Article Title: | The report of AAPM task group 288: Recommendations for guiding radiotherapy event narratives |
| Abstract: | Incident reporting and learning systems provide an opportunity to identify systemic vulnerabilities that contribute to incidents and potentially degrade quality. The narrative of an incident is intended to provide a clear, easy to understand description of an incident. Unclear, incomplete or poorly organized narratives compromise the ability to learn from them. This report provides guidance for drafting effective narratives, with particular attention to the use of narratives in incident reporting and learning systems (IRLS). Examples are given that compare effective and less than effective narratives. This report is mostly directed to organizations that maintain IRLS, but also may be helpful for individuals who desire to write a useful narrative for entry into such a system. Recommendations include the following: (1) Systems should allow a one- or two-sentence, free-text synopsis of an incident without guessing at causes; (2) Information included should form a sequence of events with chronology; and (3) Reporting and learning systems should consider using the headings suggested to guide the reporter through the narrative: (a) incident occurrences and actions by role; (b) prior circumstances and actions; (c) method by which the incident was identified; (d) equipment related details if relevant; (e) recovery actions by role; (f) relevant time span between responses; (g) and how individuals affected during or immediately after incident. When possible and appropriate, supplementary information including relevant data elements should be included using numerical scales or drop-down choices outside of the narrative. Information that should not be included in the narrative includes: (a) patient health information (PHI); (b) conjecture or blame; (c) jargon abbreviations or details without specifying their significance; (d) causal analysis. |
| Keywords: | event reporting; incident report databases; incident reporting |
| Journal Title: | Medical Physics |
| ISSN: | 0094-2405 |
| Publisher: | American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
| Publication status: | Online ahead of print |
| Date Published: | 2024-01-01 |
| Online Publication Date: | 2024-01-01 |
| Language: | English |
| ACCESSION: | WOS:001278705800001 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/mp.17282 |
| PROVIDER: | wos |
| Notes: | Article; Early Access -- Source: Wos |
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
Related MSK Work