Phase III trial of pirtobrutinib versus idelalisib/rituximab or bendamustine/rituximab in covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor-pretreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (BRUIN CLL-321) Journal Article


Authors: Sharman, J. P.; Munir, T.; Grosicki, S.; Roeker, L. E.; Burke, J. M.; Chen, C. I.; Grzasko, N.; Follows, G.; Mátrai, Z.; Sanna, A.; Qiu, L. G.; Feng, R.; Hua, V. M.; Jurczak, W.; Ritgen, M.; Yi, S. H.; Bosch, F.; Coombs, C. C.; Bao, K.; Patel, V.; Liu, B.; Compte, L.; Guntur, A.; Wang, D. Y.; Hill, M.; Leow, C. C.; Ghia, P.; Barr, P. M.
Article Title: Phase III trial of pirtobrutinib versus idelalisib/rituximab or bendamustine/rituximab in covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor-pretreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (BRUIN CLL-321)
Abstract: PURPOSEPirtobrutinib, a noncovalent, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), has shown clinical efficacy and a favorable safety profile. BRUIN CLL-321 was an open-label, randomized phase III study conducted exclusively in patients with R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) previously treated with cBTKi, and compared pirtobrutinib with investigator's choice (IC) of idelalisib/rituximab (IdelaR) or bendamustine/rituximab (BR).METHODSPatients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pirtobrutinib (200 mg once daily) or IC of IdelaR or BR, and were stratified by previous use of venetoclax and del(17p). The primary end point was independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included time to next treatment or death (TTNT), overall survival (OS), and safety. The primary PFS end point was met at the time of the primary analysis (August 29, 2023), and updated results are reported from the final OS analysis (August 29, 2024).RESULTSA total of 238 patients were randomly assigned to receive pirtobrutinib (n = 119) or IC (n = 119; IdelaR [n = 82], BR [n = 37]). The PFS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.54 ([95% CI, 0.39 to 0.75]; P = .0002), with a median PFS of 14 months (95% CI, 11.2 to 16.6) in the pirtobrutinib group and 8.7 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 10.4) with IC. The unadjusted OS HR was 1.09 ([95% CI, 0.68 to 1.75]; P = .7202), and 18-month OS rate was 73.4% (95% CI, 63.9 to 80.7) in the pirtobrutinib group and 70.8% (95% CI, 60.9 to 78.7) with IC. Median TTNT was 24 months (95% CI, 17.8 to 29.7) with pirtobrutinib versus 10.9 months (95% CI, 8.7 to 12.5) with IC (HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.52]). At a median follow-up of 17.2 months, grade >= 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were lower with pirtobrutinib (57.7%) than IC (73.4%). Treatment discontinuation due to AE occurred in 20 (17.2%) patients receiving pirtobrutinib and 38 (34.9%) patients receiving IC.CONCLUSIONPirtobrutinib improved PFS and TTNT, and demonstrated favorable tolerability, versus IdelaR/BR in exclusively cBTKi pretreated patients with CLL/SLL.
Keywords: rituximab
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 43
Issue: 22
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2025-08-01
Start Page: 2538
End Page: 2549
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:001533434900001
DOI: 10.1200/jco-25-00166
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC12288890
PUBMED: 40479620
Notes: Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Lindsey Elizabeth Roeker
    143 Roeker