International Medical Graduates Representation at International Oncology Conference Meetings: An Analysis of ASCO Annual Meetings Journal Article


Authors: Roy, A. M.; Bakouny, Z.; Dizman, N.; Paul, M. A.; Ozay, Z. I.; Lal, B. M.; Nawfal, R.; Eid, M.; Chehade, R. E. H.; Machaalani, M.; Butt, A.; Aggarwal, C.; Bekaii-Saab, T.; Chavez-Macgregor, M.; Lopes, G.; Marshall, A. L.; Murphy, M.; Owonikoko, T.; Xie, W.; Lee, A. I.; Choueiri, T. K.
Article Title: International Medical Graduates Representation at International Oncology Conference Meetings: An Analysis of ASCO Annual Meetings
Abstract: PURPOSEDespite international medical graduates (IMGs) accounting for up to one third of all practicing oncologists in the United States, and nearly half of fellowship trainees, little is known about their contributions to presentations at international oncology meetings. Therefore, we investigated the representation of IMGs in invited faculty roles at the ASCO Annual Meeting as a representative example.METHODSPresentation data from ASCO 2022 and 2023 Annual Meetings were obtained from program guides. We collected presentation-level and speaker-level variables of invited faculty roles and original research. Speakers were categorized as American medical graduate (AMG), IMG, non-US-based, or non-MD (Doctor of Medicine). Univariable and multivariable analyses assessed factors influencing selection for invited faculty roles.RESULTSA total of 2,590 presentations by 2,109 unique speakers were reviewed, including primary research presenters and invited faculty. Among the 1,352 presentations by AMGs, 30% were primary research and 70% were invited faculty roles. For the 374 presentations by IMGs, 41% were primary research and 59% were invited faculty roles. Notably, first-author IMGs were significantly less likely to receive invited faculty roles relative to their primary research output compared with first-author AMGs (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.90]; P =.006), even when accounting for academic rank, presumed sex, and year.CONCLUSIONRelative to IMGs' original research output, IMGs appear to receive fewer invitations for ASCO Annual Meeting invited faculty roles compared with AMGs. Our findings suggest potential underrepresentation and under-recognition of IMGs in these roles, despite their contributions to the oncology workforce in the United States. © 2025 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: united states; oncology; physician; workforce; graduate; oncologist; human; male; female; article
Journal Title: JCO Oncology Practice
ISSN: 2688-1527
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2025-01-01
Start Page: OP
End Page: 25
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/op-25-00067
PUBMED: 40577682
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics