AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations: Reducing the Surgical Footprint of Surgery for Spinal Metastases Journal Article
| Authors: | Silva González, A.; Chen, H.; Disch, A. C.; Kam, J.; O’Toole, J. E.; Dea, N.; Gasbarrini, A.; Laufer, I.; Netzer, C.; Reynolds, J.; Rhines, L. D.; Sahgal, A.; Verlaan, J. J.; Fisher, C. G.; Barzilai, O. |
| Article Title: | AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations: Reducing the Surgical Footprint of Surgery for Spinal Metastases |
| Abstract: | Study Design: Literature review with clinical recommendations. Objective: Spinal metastases represent a late complication of cancer and a major factor in decreased quality of life. The role of surgery for specific indications for spinal metastases is well established. Given the significant morbidity associated with spine surgery in this frail population, efforts are ongoing to decrease the surgical footprint. The objective of this study is to provide the readers with a concise curation of the latest spine literature on reducing the surgical footprint for spine metastases and clinical recommendations for how the practicing clinician should interpret and make use of this evidence. Methods: The latest spine literature in the topic of reducing the surgical footprint for spine metastases was reviewed and clinical recommendations were formulated. The recommendations are dichotomously graded into strong and conditional based on the integration of scientific methodology and content expert opinion. This opinion considers experience and practical issues such as risks, burdens, costs, patient values, and circumstances. Results: Four high impact studies were selected for review. The findings suggest that surgery plays a key role in improving patients’ quality of life, but incidence of adverse events remains high and hence methods to decrease surgical morbidity are necessary. The integration of radiation into the treatment algorithm allows for less extensive surgical procedures and SBRT should be strongly considered after surgery for spine metastases in appropriate patient populations. Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols reduce perioperative morbidity for both open and minimally invasive surgeries and should be considered on an institutional level. Utilization of minimally invasive surgical stabilization should be considered as it results in fewer post operative complications, lower infection rates, less blood loss during surgery, and a shorter hospital stay compared to open stabilization of unstable pathology thoracolumbar fractures. Conclusions: The role and benefits of surgery for metastatic spine disease are well established, yet surgery carries significant risk for adverse events which may negatively affect overall cancer care. Methods for reducing the surgical footprint include incorporation of stereotactic radiation allowing less extensive surgery, implementation of ERAS protocols and utilization of minimally invasive surgical strategies. © The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
| Keywords: | radiosurgery; enhanced recovery after surgery; minimally invasive spine surgery; frail; spinal metases |
| Journal Title: | Global Spine Journal |
| ISSN: | 2192-5682 |
| Publisher: | Georg Thieme Verlag |
| Date Published: | 2025-01-01 |
| Start Page: | 21925682251352442 |
| Language: | English |
| DOI: | 10.1177/21925682251352442 |
| PROVIDER: | scopus |
| PMCID: | PMC12170550 |
| PUBMED: | 40521797 |
| DOI/URL: | |
| Notes: | Review -- Source: Scopus |
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
Related MSK Work