Encorafenib, cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 in BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer Journal Article


Authors: Elez, E.; Yoshino, T.; Shen, L.; Lonardi, S.; Van Cutsem, E.; Eng, C.; Kim, T. W.; Wasan, H. S.; Desai, J.; Ciardiello, F.; Yaeger, R.; Maughan, T. S.; Morris, V. K.; Wu, C.; Usari, T.; Laliberte, R.; Dychter, S. S.; Zhang, X.; Tabernero, J.; Kopetz, S.; for the BREAKWATER Trial Investigators
Article Title: Encorafenib, cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 in BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer
Abstract: Background First-line treatment with encorafenib plus cetuximab (EC) with or without chemotherapy (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil [mFOLFOX6]) for BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, an aggressive subtype with a poor prognosis, was compared with standard care (chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab) in an open-label, phase 3 trial, which showed significance regarding one of the two primary end points, objective response according to blinded independent central review (odds ratio for EC+mFOLFOX6 vs. standard care, 2.44; one-sided P<0.001). This result led to accelerated Food and Drug Administration approval of this investigational combination therapy for BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, including as first-line therapy. Data on progression-free survival (the second primary end point) and an updated interim analysis of overall survival are now available. Methods We randomly assigned patients with untreated BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer to receive EC, EC+mFOLFOX6, or standard care. The two primary end points were objective response (reported previously) and progression-free survival according to blinded independent central review in the EC+mFOLFOX6 group and the standard-care group. The key secondary end point was overall survival. Results Significantly longer progression-free survival was seen with EC+mFOLFOX6 than with standard care (median, 12.8 vs. 7.1 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.68; P<0.001). In an interim analysis, overall survival was significantly longer with EC+mFOLFOX6 than with standard care (median, 30.3 vs. 15.1 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.63; P<0.001). The incidence of serious adverse events during treatment was 46.1% with EC+mFOLFOX6 and 38.9% with standard care. Safety profiles were consistent with those known for each agent. Conclusions This trial showed significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival with first-line treatment with EC+mFOLFOX6 than with standard care among patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. © 2025 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Keywords: adult; cancer chemotherapy; cancer survival; controlled study; human tissue; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; gene mutation; major clinical study; overall survival; genetics; mutation; clinical trial; mortality; bevacizumab; fluorouracil; diarrhea; drug dose reduction; drug efficacy; drug safety; drug withdrawal; cancer patient; comparative study; cancer staging; follow up; antineoplastic agent; colorectal cancer; metastasis; progression free survival; anemia; nausea; randomized controlled trial; vomiting; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; cetuximab; histology; arthralgia; colorectal neoplasms; confidence interval; proportional hazards model; death; sulfonamide; multicenter study; colorectal tumor; sulfonamides; folinic acid; microsatellite instability; neoplasm metastasis; phase 3 clinical trial; platinum complex; drug therapy; oxaliplatin; organoplatinum compounds; leucovorin; b raf kinase; carbamic acid; carbamates; proto-oncogene proteins b-raf; braf protein, human; progression-free survival; clinical outcome; gastroenterology; hematology/oncology; cancer prognosis; folfox protocol; very elderly; humans; human; male; female; article; encorafenib; gastrointestinal tract cancer; treatments in oncology
Journal Title: New England Journal of Medicine
Volume: 392
Issue: 24
ISSN: 0028-4793
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society  
Date Published: 2025-06-26
Start Page: 2425
End Page: 2437
Language: English
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2501912
PUBMED: 40444708
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC12197837
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PubMed record and PDF -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Rona Denit Yaeger
    323 Yaeger