| Abstract: |
Introduction: Findings from early phase studies are not always placed in the public domain. This study aims to explore why many early phase clinical oncology studies are not published, as well as identify the potential barriers investigators encountered in the publication process. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted among investigators with experience in early phase clinical oncology studies. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Twenty-one investigators were interviewed. The majority worked in Europe (n = 13), while other investigators were based in North America (n = 4), Asia (n = 2) or Oceania (n = 2). We identified three reasons why investigators believed publishing early phase clinical trial results was important: (1) there is an ethical and moral responsibility; (2) there should be no loss of knowledge to society; and (3) there should be no waste of resources. Four main barriers in the publication process of early phase clinical trials were identified: (1) practical barriers (eg, an increased complexity of number of trials/trial sites), (2) insufficient resources (eg, money, time and human), (3) limited motivation (eg, limited intrinsic motivation of the investigator or limited prospect of return for the sponsor), and (4) inadequate collaboration (eg, different interests between industry partners and investigators). Finally, five major stakeholders were identified that can potentially contribute to improving the publication process: (1) journal editors, (2) sponsors, (3) investigators, (4) regulatory bodies, and (5) society. Investigator suggestions for improving this process, for each stakeholder, are presented. Conclusions: This study highlights the barriers experienced in publishing early phase clinical trials. Recognizing and acknowledging these barriers is crucial to devise effective strategies to improve the publishing and public sharing of early phase clinical trials. © The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press. |
