Impact of clonal hematopoiesis on solid tumor progression following radiation therapy Journal Article


Authors: Tao, J. J.; Setton, J.; Vela, P. S.; Safonov, A. M.; Comen, E. A.; Braunstein, L. Z.; Reis-Filho, J. S.; Riaz, N.; Powell, S. N.; Levine, R. L.; Norton, L.; Razavi, P.; Khan, A. J.
Article Title: Impact of clonal hematopoiesis on solid tumor progression following radiation therapy
Abstract: PURPOSE Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) has been shown to adversely affect outcomes in patients with nonhematologic cancers. However, the effects of CH on response to specific treatments, including radiation therapy (RT), are unknown. METHODS We analyzed patients with solid tumors harboring nonpathogenic somatic or germline ATM mutations (n 5 144) and FAT1 mutations (n 5 270) who received RT and underwent prospective tumor and matched WBC sequencing using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets assay. CH variants were detected in blood samples using a well-validated CH variant detection pipeline. We compared irradiated tumor progression in patients with and without CH. Nonpathogenic ATM mutations and FAT1 mutations have previously been shown not to be associated with response to RT. RESULTS The final cohort consisted of 412 patients who underwent 811 total courses of RT. One hundred sixty-one patients (39.1%) had CH; the most frequently mutated genes were DNMT3A (25.6%), PPM1D (6.2%), TET2 (5.8%), and TP53 (5.0%). Fine-Gray competing-risks analysis, with death treated as a competing event, showed no difference in irradiated tumor progression between patients with and without CH (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.72 to 1.66]; P 5 .68). Similarly, subanalyses of CH variant allele frequency and CH mutations in putative cancer drivers did not reveal an association with RT response. CONCLUSION We found no difference in irradiated tumor progression between patients with and without CH. Further studies are warranted to examine the potential clinical implications of CH on treatment responsiveness of solid tumors. © 2025 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; treatment response; aged; major clinical study; solid tumor; cancer radiotherapy; cohort analysis; gene frequency; protein p53; risk assessment; atm protein; tumor growth; dna methyltransferase 3a; exploratory research; clonal hematopoiesis; human; male; female; article
Journal Title: JCO Precision Oncology
Volume: 9
ISSN: 2473-4284
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2025-05-01
Start Page: e2400548
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/po-24-00548
PUBMED: 40249883
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PDF -- MSK corresponding author is Atif Khan -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Simon Nicholas Powell
    331 Powell
  2. Larry Norton
    758 Norton
  3. Nadeem Riaz
    414 Riaz
  4. Elizabeth Comen
    72 Comen
  5. Ross Levine
    775 Levine
  6. Jeremy Setton
    93 Setton
  7. Pedram Razavi
    172 Razavi
  8. Atif Jalees Khan
    152 Khan
  9. Anton Safonov
    30 Safonov