Peritoneal washings analysis in endometrial cancer: Comparison of somatic mutation detection with panel sequencing and traditional cytology Journal Article


Authors: Byrne, M. E.; Selenica, P.; Dessources, K.; Da Cruz Paula, A.; Gordhandas, S.; Wu, M.; Pareja, F.; Roche, K. L.; Mueller, J. J.; Sonoda, Y.; Abu-Rustum, N. R.; Weigelt, B.
Article Title: Peritoneal washings analysis in endometrial cancer: Comparison of somatic mutation detection with panel sequencing and traditional cytology
Abstract: Objectives: The prognostic significance of positive pelvic washings in endometrial cancer (EC) remains unknown, and little data exist regarding washings as a source of genetic information in relation to a patient's tumor. We sought to assess the feasibility of identifying EC mutations in peritoneal washings. Methods: Peritoneal washings from 21 biopsy-confirmed newly diagnosed patients with EC across disease stages between 09/2018 and 07/2019 were collected. Peritoneal washings, primary EC, and normal DNA samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing targeting 468 cancer-related genes. Sequencing results were compared to cytological analysis. Results: For the 21 EC cases included, cytology found 8 (38 %) of the peritoneal washings as positive, 7 (33 %) as negative, and 6 (29 %) as suspicious or rare-atypical cells. Based on molecular analysis, tumor mutations (TMs) were detected in 18/21 (86 %) of peritoneal washings. Overall, 11/21 (52 %) samples demonstrated concordant results between cytologic and molecular analysis, and all positive cytologic results were confirmed with molecular analysis. However, of cases with negative or suspicious cytology results, 77 % (10/13) were found to have TMs in washings. Five patients with negative cytology were positive on molecular analysis (5/7, 71 %), and 5 patients with suspicious washings demonstrated TMs (5/6, 83 %). Of the 10 EC patients who developed recurrences, regardless of stage, 5/10 (50 %) patients had positive cytology, whereas 9/10 (90 %) had TMs based on molecular analysis. Conclusions: Mutational analysis of peritoneal washings using panel sequencing in EC is feasible. A substantial subset of patients with cytology-negative or suspicious washings had TMs detected. © 2025 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords: adult; clinical article; controlled study; human tissue; aged; primary tumor; somatic mutation; cancer recurrence; cancer patient; cancer staging; endometrioid carcinoma; endometrium cancer; cytology; peritoneum lavage; tumor biopsy; feasibility study; cancer cytodiagnosis; early cancer; microsatellite instability; dna extraction; endometrial carcinoma; endometrium biopsy; mutation detection; molecular diagnosis; international federation of gynecology and obstetrics; proof of concept; peritoneal washings; high throughput sequencing; next-generation sequencing; very elderly; human; female; article; peritoneal washing; early cancer diagnosis; tumor mutational burden; tumor-related gene; panel sequencing
Journal Title: Gynecologic Oncology
Volume: 197
ISSN: 0090-8258
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2025-06-01
Start Page: 155
End Page: 162
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.05.002
PUBMED: 40347837
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC12160577
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PDF. Corresponding MSK author is Britta Weigelt -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Yukio Sonoda
    472 Sonoda
  2. Britta Weigelt
    633 Weigelt
  3. Jennifer Jean Mueller
    186 Mueller
  4. Pier Selenica
    190 Selenica
  5. Maureen Byrne
    14 Byrne
  6. Michelle Wu
    24 Wu