Treatment of high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer Guidelines


Authors: Pennathur, A.; Lanuti, M.; Merritt, R. E.; Wolf, A.; Keshavarz, H.; Loo, B. W. Jr; Suh, R. D.; Mak, R. H.; Brunelli, A.; Criner, G. J.; Mazzone, P. J.; Walsh, G.; Liptay, M.; Wafford, Q. E.; Murthy, S.; Marshall, M. B.; Tong, B.; Pettiford, B.; Rocco, G.; Luketich, J.; Schuchert, M. J.; Varghese, T. K. Jr; D'Amico, T. A.; Swanson, S. J.; The AATS Clinical Practice Standards Committee: Thoracic Surgery
Title: Treatment of high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer
Abstract: Objectives: A significant proportion of patients with stage I non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are considered at high risk for complications or mortality after lobectomy. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) previously published important considerations in determining which patients are considered high risk. The current objective was to evaluate treatment options and important factors to consider during treatment selection for these high-risk patients. Methods: The AATS Clinical Practice Standards Committee assembled an expert panel to review treatment options for high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC. After a systematic search of the literature identification of lung-nodule-related factors to consider in treatment selection, the panel developed expert consensus statements and vignettes using a modified Delphi method. A 75% consensus was required for approval. Results: The expert panel identified sublobar resection, image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA), and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), which is also known as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), as modalities applicable in the treatment of high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC. Fourteen statements and 5 vignettes illustrating clinical scenarios were formulated, revised, and ultimately approved. Conclusion: The choice of which modality (sublobar resection, SABR, or IGTA) is optimal in high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC is complex, but a surgical approach is generally favored when deemed safe. SABR and IGTA are reasonable options in select patients, with SABR being the likely next choice in nonsurgical patients. If possible, obtaining a biopsy is very important prior non-surgical treatment. A multi-disciplinary review of patient and tumor characteristics is essential for achieving an optimal decision. The clinical treatment decision should also take patient perspectives, preferences, and quality of life into consideration. © 2024 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords: treatment outcome; cancer surgery; mortality; patient selection; cancer staging; lymph node dissection; neoplasm staging; consensus; carcinoma, non-small-cell lung; lung neoplasms; pneumonectomy; risk factors; editorial; practice guideline; pathology; risk factor; high risk patient; risk assessment; lung tumor; radiosurgery; ablation techniques; surgery; consensus development; clinical decision making; interstitial lung disease; fibrosing alveolitis; stereotactic radiosurgery; radiofrequency ablation; stereotactic body radiation therapy; lobectomy; therapy; ablation therapy; non small cell lung cancer; high-risk; adverse event; thermal ablation; sublobar resection; clinical decision-making; humans; human; image-guided ablation; likert scale; expert consensus; stage i non-small cell lung cancer; stereotactic body radiation treatment; image-guided thermal ablation
Journal Title: Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume: 37
Issue: 1
ISSN: 1043-0679
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2025-03-01
Start Page: 67
End Page: 74
Language: English
DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2024.10.002
PUBMED: 39672521
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Editorial -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Gaetano Rocco
    129 Rocco