Multicancer early detection testing: Guidance for primary care discussions with patients Review


Authors: Hoffman, R. M.; Wolf, A. M. D.; Raoof, S.; Guerra, C. E.; Church, T. R.; Elkin, E. B.; Etzioni, R. D.; Shih, Y. C. T.; Skates, S. J.; Manassaram-Baptiste, D.; Smith, R. A.
Review Title: Multicancer early detection testing: Guidance for primary care discussions with patients
Abstract: Multicancer early detection (MCED) tests are an emerging technology for cancer screening. MCED tests can detect cancer signals from multiple cancers concurrently in biological samples such as blood, urine, saliva, or other bodily fluids. Some tests can suggest the most likely cancer origin, whereas others report cancer detected somewhere in the body. Although some MCED tests are currently commercially available, none are approved by the Food and Drug Administration or endorsed by any clinical practice guideline or recommendation. Most insurance companies do not currently cover MCED testing. MCED tests have not yet been evaluated for safety and effectiveness in randomized controlled trials. Because patients already are asking for MCED test prescriptions or for interpretation of results from tests acquired elsewhere, clinicians should be prepared to discuss what is known about the benefits, risks, and uncertainties of MCED testing, including performance characteristics in screening populations and preferred follow-up strategies for positive test results. At this time, clinicians should not feel obligated to initiate discussions about MCED testing with their patients. However, clinicians should engage patients who inquire about getting tested or previous MCED test results in shared decision-making, and take the opportunity to offer and help patients complete age- and sex-appropriate guideline-recommended cancer screenings. In this article, the current evidence and issues around MCED testing are summarized, and a framework for shared decision-making discussions is provided. © 2025 The Author(s). Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.
Keywords: cancer risk; united states; follow up; clinical practice; neoplasm; neoplasms; colorectal cancer; breast cancer; morbidity; cancer screening; mass screening; practice guideline; risk factor; cancer mortality; prostate cancer; early diagnosis; uterine cervix cancer; diagnosis; practice guidelines as topic; clinical practice guideline; primary medical care; multiple cancer; early detection of cancer; predictive value; body fluid; prevention and control; primary health care; shared decision making; american cancer society; saliva; procedures; humans; human; article; early cancer diagnosis; positron emission tomography-computed tomography; malignant neoplasm; neoplasms/diagnosis/prevention and control; multicancer early detection testing
Journal Title: Cancer
Volume: 131
Issue: 7
ISSN: 0008-543X
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2025-04-01
Start Page: e35823
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35823
PUBMED: 40170549
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11962340
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Sana Raoof
    19 Raoof