Osseous maxillary reconstruction with immediate dental implant placement: An optimized workflow for the oncologic patient Journal Article


Authors: Matros, E.; Kim, L. N.; Poveromo, L.; Polanco, T.; Rosen, E.; Ganly, I.; Boyle, J.; Cohen, M.; Randazzo, J. D.; Shahzad, F.; Patel, S. G.; Nelson, J. A.; Cordeiro, P. G.; Allen, R. J. Jr
Article Title: Osseous maxillary reconstruction with immediate dental implant placement: An optimized workflow for the oncologic patient
Abstract: Background:Maxillary reconstruction is a complex undertaking characterized by a 3-dimensional surgical site with deficiencies in multiple tissue types. Before virtual surgical planning (VSP), bony reconstruction was inaccurate and inefficient; thus, reconstructions defaulted to soft-tissue flaps or obturators. The current study describes an efficient and accurate approach to bony maxillary reconstruction with immediate dental implant placement (IDIP).Methods:A reconstructive workflow was developed for osseous reconstruction to improve functional and aesthetic outcomes. Critical aspects include VSP, 3-dimensionally printed plates, and IDIP. Review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients who underwent osseous maxillary reconstruction with a fibula flap and immediate dental implants from 2017 to 2022, with a focus on oncologic characteristics and reconstructive outcomes.Results:During the study, 20 patients underwent maxillary reconstruction with VSP and IDIP. One dental implant of 55 failed to osseointegrate, and no flaps were lost. Three patients experienced partial loss of the fibula skin island; 1 required palatal closure with a radial forearm flap, and 2 were managed with outpatient d & eacute;bridement. Fifteen patients achieved either an interim or final retained dental prosthesis. All prostheses achieved acceptable aesthetic results without the instability associated with non-bone-borne devices (eg, dentures/obturators). No patients experienced delays in oncologic treatment.Conclusions:VSP technology has enabled surgeons to replace like with like to achieve better outcomes with acceptable morbidity for maxillary defects. IDIP provides all patients an opportunity for a fixed prosthesis even though not all complete the process. This maxillary reconstruction workflow can be safely accomplished in oncologic patients with promising and effective early results.CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic, IV.
Keywords: algorithm; rehabilitation; outcomes; design; classification-system; maxillectomy; insertion; osteoseptocutaneous free-flap; fibula free flaps; maxillomandibular defects
Journal Title: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume: 155
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0032-1052
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2025-03-01
Start Page: 549
End Page: 560
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:001430624200008
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000011642
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 39023533
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PubMed record and PDF. Corresponding MSK author is Evan Matros -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jay O Boyle
    148 Boyle
  2. Snehal G Patel
    412 Patel
  3. Peter G Cordeiro
    283 Cordeiro
  4. Evan Matros
    203 Matros
  5. Ian Ganly
    431 Ganly
  6. Evan Blake Rosen
    28 Rosen
  7. Jonas Allan Nelson
    210 Nelson
  8. Marc A Cohen
    136 Cohen
  9. Thais O Polanco
    24 Polanco
  10. Farooq Shahzad
    38 Shahzad
  11. Leslie Narae Kim
    12 Kim