Utilization and perceptions of chaplaincy among hospitalized adults of Dharmic religions with cancer Journal Article


Authors: Patel, R. V.; Bowden, J. M.; Boselli, D.; Strahley, A. E.; Gibbs, S. E. L.; Murali, K. P.; Patel, V. R.; Kotecha, R. R.; Nelson, J. E.
Article Title: Utilization and perceptions of chaplaincy among hospitalized adults of Dharmic religions with cancer
Abstract: Background: Spiritual care provided by chaplains plays a key role in cancer care in the United States, yet little is known about chaplaincy utilization among people of Dharmic religions (Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Jainism) with cancer. Methods: This multi-methods study reviewed the records of patients (aged 18 years and older) who were hospitalized at a dedicated cancer hospital (2015–2019) and conducted interviews with chaplains and adults of Dharmic religions (2020). Primary outcomes included measuring chaplaincy utilization (at least one chaplain visit) across different religions and identifying perceptions of chaplaincy. Secondary outcomes involved measuring unmet spiritual needs on admission, types of spiritual care needs, and variables associated with chaplaincy utilization. Results: Of 54,828 patients, 2% were of Dharmic religions (n = 1163; 58.4% Hindu, 33.2% Buddhist, 4.8% Sikh, 3.4% multiple, <1% Jain). Compared with others, those of Dharmic religions were younger (median age, 59 vs. 63 years; p <.001), predominantly East or South Asian (78.7% vs. 5.6%; p <.001), and had higher rates of advanced illness (22.6% vs. 15.2%; p <.001) but lower chaplaincy utilization (31.6% vs. 36.7%; p <.001). There were no significant differences in unmet spiritual needs on admission (Dharmic religions vs. others, 8.7% vs. 9.4%; p =.41). Ritual care was the most frequently documented spiritual care need (72%). Multivariable analysis indicated that longer length of stay, non-Dharmic religion, and advanced illness were associated with higher chaplaincy utilization. Themes identified from the interviews included unfamiliarity with chaplaincy, concerns about faith-discordant care, addressing spiritual care needs independently, and solutions for concordant care. Conclusions: People of Dharmic religions with cancer were less likely to use chaplaincy services. Barriers included unfamiliarity and faith discordance. Spiritual care incorporating faith-specific resources is urgently needed. © 2025 The Author(s). Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.
Keywords: psycho-oncology; spiritual care; chaplaincy; health equity
Journal Title: Cancer
Volume: 131
Issue: 7
ISSN: 0008-543X
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2025-04-01
Start Page: e35797
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35797
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11927932
PUBMED: 40117339
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Judith Eve Nelson
    89 Nelson
  2. Jill Marie Bowden
    9 Bowden
  3. Rushil Patel
    5 Patel
  4. Ritesh Rajesh Kotecha
    91 Kotecha