Molecular tumor board in patients with metastatic breast cancer Journal Article


Authors: Boscolo Bielo, L.; Guerini Rocco, E.; Crimini, E.; Repetto, M.; Lombardi, M.; Zanzottera, C.; Aurilio, G.; Barberis, M.; Belli, C.; Zhan, Y.; Battaiotto, E.; Katrini, J.; Marsicano, R.; Zagami, P.; Taurelli Salimbeni, B.; Esposito, A.; Trapani, D.; Criscitiello, C.; Fusco, N.; Marra, A.; Curigliano, G.
Article Title: Molecular tumor board in patients with metastatic breast cancer
Abstract: Purpose: Comprehensive genomic profiling is becoming increasingly important in the management of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Real-world clinical outcomes from applying molecular tumor boards (MTBs) recommendations in this context remain limited. Accordingly, we conducted a retrospective, single-institution analysis to evaluate the clinical impact of discussing patients affected by mBC at the MTB. Methods: Clinicogenomic data of patients affected by mBCs referred to the European Institute of Oncology MTB between August 2019 and December 2023 were reviewed. Genomic alterations were classified by ESCAT framework. Clinical outcomes of patients showing actionable alterations and receiving molecular-matched therapy (MMT) were compared to those receiving standard therapy (ST). Results: Ninety-six patients were included. Following MTB discussion, genetic counseling was recommended in 27% (n = 26) of patients, while additional molecular analyses were requested in 25% (n = 24) cases. Fifty-six patients (58%) displayed at least one actionable alteration. For patients with available follow-up (n = 50), 32 (64%) received MMTs and 18 (36%) ST. No differences in real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) (4.07 months [95% CI 2.14–8.28] vs. 3.12 months [95% CI 1.51-NE], P = 0.8) and 12-month overall survival (OS) (58% [95%CI 43–78] vs. 57% [95%CI 34–97), P = 0.9) were observed between the MMT- and ST-group. Level I ESCAT alterations yielded longer rwPFS (5.82 months [95% CI 3.12–8.41]) compared to ESCAT II (2.14 months [95%CI 1.61-NE]) and ESCAT III (2.10 months [95% CI 2.04-NE]; P = 0.03). Twenty-four percent of patients showed a PFS2/PFS1 ratio > 1.3 from MMT. Conclusion: Molecular tumor boards can provide additional treatment options for patients affected by mBC. Besides treatment recommendations, MTBs also have the utility to assess the validity of discussed genomic reports and to identify alterations worthy of genetic counseling. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.
Keywords: adult; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; retrospective studies; genetics; mortality; metastasis; breast cancer; pathology; breast neoplasms; retrospective study; tumor marker; breast tumor; neoplasm metastasis; genomics; therapy; personalized medicine; molecularly targeted therapy; molecular targeted therapy; procedures; very elderly; humans; human; female; precision medicine; biomarkers, tumor; precision oncology; molecular tumor board; mtb
Journal Title: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume: 210
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0167-6806
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2025-02-01
Start Page: 45
End Page: 55
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07535-z
PUBMED: 39476312
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Matteo Repetto
    26 Repetto