Microwave ablation of refractory oligometastatic non–small cell lung cancer in the liver Journal Article


Authors: Geevarghese, R.; Kunin, H.; Petre, E. N.; Deng, R.; Jain, S.; Sotirchos, V. S.; Zhao, K.; Sofocleous, C. T.; Solomon, S. B.; Ziv, E.; Alexander, E.
Article Title: Microwave ablation of refractory oligometastatic non–small cell lung cancer in the liver
Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of liver metastases (LMs) secondary to non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with NSCLC who underwent MWA of LM from March 2015 to July 2022. Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using competing risk analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method. Postprocedural adverse events were recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Results: Twenty-three patients with 32 LMs were treated in 27 MWA sessions. The mean dimension of the largest index tumor was 1.96 cm (SD ± 0.75). Technical success was 100%. Technical effectiveness was achieved in 26 (81.3%) of 32 tumors. The median length of follow-up was 37.7 months (interquartile range, 20.5–54.5 months). The median LTPFS was 16.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.87–44.10 months). The median OS was 31.7 months (95% CI, 11.1–65.8 months). Ablation margin was a significant factor for LTPFS, with tumors ablated without a measurable margin being more likely to progress than those with measurable margins (subdistribution hazard ratios [HRs], 0.008–0.024; P < .001). Older age (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09–1.28; P < .001) and presence of synchronous lung metastases (HR, 14.73; 95% CI, 1.86–116.95; P = .011) were significant predictors of OS. Serious adverse events (CTCAE Grade ≥3) within 30 days occurred in 2 (7.4%) of 27 sessions, including pulmonary embolus and severe abdominal pain. Conclusions: Percutaneous MWA was a safe treatment for NSCLC LM, with longer survival noted in younger patients and those without synchronous lung tumors. © 2024 SIR
Keywords: adult; aged; middle aged; survival analysis; survival rate; major clinical study; overall survival; constipation; fatigue; gemcitabine; cancer patient; follow up; cohort analysis; retrospective study; age; risk assessment; coughing; dyspnea; fever; hypoxia; lung embolism; liver metastasis; lung metastasis; minimal residual disease; cancer size; clinical evaluation; patient safety; predictor variable; clinical effectiveness; observational study; multiple cancer; disease exacerbation; descriptive research; abscopal effect; non small cell lung cancer; molecularly targeted therapy; tumor ablation; clinical outcome; shoulder pain; chest tightness; survival prediction; upper abdominal pain; refractory cancer; dabrafenib; trametinib; Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; hand pain; intention to treat analysis; human; male; female; article; median survival time; ecog performance status; microwave thermotherapy; pain severity; local tumor progression free survival; local progression free survival; procedural pain; tumor margin
Journal Title: Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume: 36
Issue: 2
ISSN: 1051-0443
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2025-02-01
Start Page: 266
End Page: 273
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.017
PUBMED: 39447638
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PDF -- MSK corresponding author is Erica Alexander -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Stephen Solomon
    422 Solomon
  2. Elena Nadia Petre
    108 Petre
  3. Etay   Ziv
    111 Ziv
  4. Henry Samuel Kunin
    23 Kunin
  5. Ken Zhao
    35 Zhao