Optimizing mainstreaming of genetic testing in parallel with ovarian and endometrial cancer tumor testing: How do we maximize our impact? Journal Article
| Authors: | Liu, Y. L.; Sia, T. Y.; Varice, N.; Wu, M.; Byrne, M.; Khurram, A.; Kemel, Y.; Sheehan, M.; Galle, J.; Sabbatini, P.; Brown, C.; Roche, K. L.; Chi, D.; Solit, D. B.; Mueller, J.; Stadler, Z. K.; Hamilton, J. G.; Aghajanian, C.; Abu-Rustum, N. R. |
| Article Title: | Optimizing mainstreaming of genetic testing in parallel with ovarian and endometrial cancer tumor testing: How do we maximize our impact? |
| Abstract: | PURPOSEAlthough germline genetic testing (GT) is recommended for all patients with ovarian cancer (OC) and some patients with endometrial cancer (EC), uptake remains low with multiple barriers. Our center performs GT in parallel with somatic testing via a targeted sequencing assay (MSK-IMPACT) and initiates testing in oncology clinics (mainstreaming). We sought to optimize our GT processes for OC/EC.METHODSWe performed a quality improvement study to evaluate our GT processes within gynecologic surgery/medical oncology clinics. All eligible patients with newly diagnosed OC/EC were identified for GT and tracked in a REDCap database. Clinical data and GT rates were collected by the study team, who reviewed data for qualitative themes.RESULTSFrom February 2023 to April 2023, we identified 116 patients with newly diagnosed OC (n = 57) and EC (n = 59). Patients were mostly White (62%); English was the preferred language for 90%. GT was performed in 52 (91%) patients with OC (seven external, 45 MSK-IMPACT) and in 44 (75%) patients with EC (three external, 41 MSK-IMPACT). GT results were available within 3 months for 100% and 95% of patients with OC and EC, respectively. Reasons for not undergoing GT included being missed by the clinical team where there was no record that GT was recommended, feeling overwhelmed, financial and privacy concerns, and language barriers. In qualitative review, we found that resources were concentrated in the initial visit with little follow-up to encourage GT at subsequent points of care.CONCLUSIONA mainstreaming approach that couples somatic and germline GT resulted in high testing rates in OC/EC; however, barriers were identified. Processes that encourage GT at multiple care points and allow self-directed, multilingual digital consenting should be piloted. |
| Keywords: | time; women; variants |
| Journal Title: | JCO Precision Oncology |
| Volume: | 8 |
| ISSN: | 2473-4284 |
| Publisher: | American Society of Clinical Oncology |
| Date Published: | 2024-12-01 |
| Start Page: | e2400525 |
| Language: | English |
| ACCESSION: | WOS:001382247200001 |
| DOI: | 10.1200/po-24-00525 |
| PROVIDER: | wos |
| PMCID: | PMC11670878 |
| PUBMED: | 39715484 |
| Notes: | The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PubMed record and PDF. Corresponding MSK author is Ying L. Liu -- Source: Wos |
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
Related MSK Work