Molecular and clinicopathologic impact of GNAS variants across solid tumors Journal Article


Authors: Johannet, P.; Abdelfattah, S.; Wilde, C.; Patel, S.; Walch, H.; Rousseau, B.; Argiles, G.; Artz, O.; Patel, M.; Arfe, A.; Cercek, A.; Yaeger, R.; Ganesh, K.; Schultz, N.; Diaz, L. A.; Foote, M. B.
Article Title: Molecular and clinicopathologic impact of GNAS variants across solid tumors
Abstract: PURPOSEThe molecular drivers underlying mucinous tumor pathogenicity are poorly understood. GNAS mutations predict metastatic burden and treatment resistance in mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma. We investigated the pan-cancer clinicopathologic relevance of GNAS variants.METHODSWe assessed 58,043 patients with Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (IMPACT)-sequenced solid tumors to identify oncogenic variants, including GNAS, associated with mucinous tumor phenotype. We then performed comprehensive molecular analyses to compare GNAS-mutant (mut) and wild-type tumors across cancers. Gene expression patterns associated with GNAS-mut tumors were assessed in a The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort. Associations between GNAS variant status and peritoneal metastasis, first-line systemic therapy response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined using a propensity-matched subcohort of patients with metastatic disease.RESULTSMucinous tumors were enriched for oncogenic GNAS variants. GNAS was mutated in >1% of small bowel, cervical, colorectal, pancreatic, esophagogastric, hepatobiliary, and GI neuroendocrine cancers. Across these cancers, GNAS-mut tumors exhibited a generally conserved C-to-T mutation-high, aneuploidy-low molecular profile with co-occurring prevalent KRAS variants (65% of GNAS-mut tumors) and fewer TP53 alterations. GNAS-mut tumors exhibited recurrently comutated alternative tumor suppressors (RBM10, INPPL1) and upregulation of MAPK and cell surface modulators. GNAS-mut tumors demonstrate an increased prevalence of peritoneal metastases (odds ratio [OR], 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5]; P =.006), worse response to first-line systemic therapy (OR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.3 to 3.8]; P =.003), and shorter PFS (median, 5.6 v 7.0 months; P =.047). In a multivariable analysis, GNAS mutated status was independently prognostic of worse OS (hazard ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.56]; adjusted P =.04).CONCLUSIONAcross the assessed cancers, GNAS-mut tumors exhibit a conserved molecular and clinical phenotype defined by mucinous tumor status, increased peritoneal metastasis, poor response to first-line systemic therapy, and worse survival. © American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: mitogen activated protein kinase; adult; cancer survival; controlled study; treatment response; aged; middle aged; unclassified drug; gene mutation; major clinical study; overall survival; genetics; mutation; mortality; liver cell carcinoma; systemic therapy; pancreas cancer; neoplasm; neoplasms; colorectal cancer; phenotype; progression free survival; antineoplastic metal complex; adenocarcinoma, mucinous; cohort analysis; pathology; protein p53; tumor marker; carcinogenesis; colon cancer; uterine cervix cancer; stomach cancer; bile duct carcinoma; upregulation; k ras protein; tumor suppressor protein; esophagus cancer; colloid carcinoma; peritoneum metastasis; guanine nucleotide binding protein; chromogranin; gallbladder cancer; fluoropyrimidine derivative; aneuploidy; small intestine cancer; pancreas islet cell tumor; clinical outcome; hepatobiliary system cancer; first-line treatment; chromogranins; cancer prognosis; humans; human; male; female; article; median survival time; differential gene expression; biomarkers, tumor; solid malignant neoplasm; molecular fingerprinting; stimulatory guanine nucleotide binding protein; gtp-binding protein alpha subunits, gs; gnas protein, human; small intestinal neuroendocrine tumor; colorectal neuroendocrine tumor; gastric neuroendocrine tumor; guanine nucleotide binding protein alpha stimulating activity polypeptide
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 42
Issue: 32
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2024-11-10
Start Page: 3847
End Page: 3857
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/jco.24.00186
PUBMED: 39121438
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11540749
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PubMed record and PDF. Corresponding MSK author is Michael B. Foote -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Rona Denit Yaeger
    324 Yaeger
  2. Nikolaus D Schultz
    491 Schultz
  3. Karuna   Ganesh
    70 Ganesh
  4. Miteshkumar V Patel
    16 Patel
  5. Luis Alberto Diaz
    153 Diaz
  6. Henry Stuart Walch
    100 Walch
  7. Michael Bonner Foote
    47 Foote
  8. Andrea Arfe
    15 Arfe
  9. Oliver Artz
    7 Artz
  10. Shrey Bipinchandra Patel
    5 Patel
  11. Callahan Wilde
    4 Wilde